Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] dnsmasq: distinct Ubus names for multiple instances

2021-07-04 Thread Etan Kissling
On 04.07.21, 14:49, "Nick Lowe" wrote: > Is this expected to contain thekelleys.org.uk? Assuming you meant uk.org.thekelleys (reversed). Yes, it is matching previous behaviour where the default name was used for all the instances. In situation where this can conflict, this patch will now onl

Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] dnsmasq: distinct Ubus names for multiple instances

2021-07-04 Thread Nick Lowe
Hi all, Is this expected to contain thekelleys.org.uk? + [ $dbus -gt 0 ] && xappend "--enable-dbus=uk.org.thekelleys.$instance_name" Best, Nick ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/lis

[PATCH v6 1/3] dnsmasq: distinct Ubus names for multiple instances

2021-06-27 Thread Etan Kissling
Currently, when using multiple dnsmasq instances they are all assigned to the same Ubus instance name. This does not work, as only a single instance can register with Ubus at a time. In the log, this leads to `Cannot add object to UBus: Invalid argument` error messages. Furthermore, upstream 3c93e8