Re: [PATCH] odhcpd: add option to use absolute timestamps

2021-02-09 Thread Nick
Maybe I will just inject via ubus a prefix, that is not reflected by the config, like the "UBUS_METHOD("add_prefix", handle_add_prefix, prefix_attrs)" At the end that gives me the flexibility I need without the need to insert absolute timestamps. Best, Nick On 2/6/21 9:33 PM, Nick wrote: I s

Re: [PATCH] odhcpd: add option to use absolute timestamps

2021-02-06 Thread Nick
I see that more as setting a preferred lifetime with a relative time-span. E.g. I will get a a preferred_lft of 120 from now, and I would set it like:   date '+%d %b %Y %T' --date="@$(($(date +%s)+120))" So it does not need to be synced, since I'm only interested in the timespan from now + 120s

Re: [PATCH] odhcpd: add option to use absolute timestamps

2021-02-06 Thread Hans Dedecker
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 5:33 PM Nick Hainke wrote: > > Until now it is not possible to give absolute timestamps in odhcpd. > This means that on every new RA or request, the timestamp is renewed. > Further, the valid and preferred lifetimes are not synced between all > devices. > > There are severa

[PATCH] odhcpd: add option to use absolute timestamps

2021-01-30 Thread Nick Hainke
Until now it is not possible to give absolute timestamps in odhcpd. This means that on every new RA or request, the timestamp is renewed. Further, the valid and preferred lifetimes are not synced between all devices. There are several usecases when it is needed to have absolute timestamp that need