On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 1:52 PM Aleksandr Mezin
wrote:
>
> By the way, this new config syntax should be documented somewhere, I guess?
It would be very helpful if the new config syntax is documented in
https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/base-system/dhcp
Hans
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 1:50 AM H
By the way, this new config syntax should be documented somewhere, I guess?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 1:50 AM Hans Dedecker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 11:55 AM Aleksandr Mezin
> wrote:
> >
> > Is something wrong with this patch? Should I CC someone to get the
> > patch reviewed? I'm
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 1:50 AM Hans Dedecker wrote:
> Nothing wrong the patch as it looks fine; it just takes some time
> before somebody finds time to review and test a patch.
> I just applied the patch to master; thx
Thank you. A few months ago, I tried to send the same patch as a pull
request
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 11:55 AM Aleksandr Mezin
wrote:
>
> Is something wrong with this patch? Should I CC someone to get the
> patch reviewed? I'm unable to figure out who is the maintainer of
> dnsmasq package
Nothing wrong the patch as it looks fine; it just takes some time
before somebody
Is something wrong with this patch? Should I CC someone to get the
patch reviewed? I'm unable to figure out who is the maintainer of
dnsmasq package
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:03 AM Aleksandr Mezin
wrote:
>
> Allow configuring ipsets with dedicated config sections:
>
> config ipset
>
Allow configuring ipsets with dedicated config sections:
config ipset
list name 'ss_rules_dst_forward'
list name 'ss_rules6_dst_forward'
list domain 't.me'
list domain 'telegram.org'
instead of current, rather inconvenient syntax:
config dnsmasq
..