Re: [PATCH] busybox: use settimeofday() instead of syscall

2020-08-07 Thread Rosen Penev
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:02 PM Rosen Penev wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:49 PM wrote: > > > > From: Masafumi UTSUGI > > > > SYS_settimeofday syscall is not time64 safe. > > Using settimeofday() instead of syscall() is recommended or > > some C libraries such as musl might cause compile er

Re: [PATCH] busybox: use settimeofday() instead of syscall

2020-08-06 Thread Rosen Penev
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:49 PM wrote: > > From: Masafumi UTSUGI > > SYS_settimeofday syscall is not time64 safe. > Using settimeofday() instead of syscall() is recommended or > some C libraries such as musl might cause compile error. Eh no. The reason for using the syscall is that musl ignores t

[PATCH] busybox: use settimeofday() instead of syscall

2020-08-06 Thread mutsugi
From: Masafumi UTSUGI SYS_settimeofday syscall is not time64 safe. Using settimeofday() instead of syscall() is recommended or some C libraries such as musl might cause compile error. Signed-off-by: Masafumi UTSUGI --- Makefile | 2 +- patches/250-date-k-flag.patch | 26 +