Re: [PATCH] base-files: Don't enable ULA IPv6 addresses by default in new config

2022-10-18 Thread Oldřich Jedlička
út 18. 10. 2022 v 16:43 odesílatel Oldřich Jedlička napsal: > > Hi, > > pá 9. 9. 2022 v 11:21 odesílatel Torsten Duwe napsal: > > > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 19:51:06 +0200 > > Thibaut wrote: > > > > > The issue was random. The client had a GUA assigned, below is the ipv6 > > > routing table at the

Re: [PATCH] base-files: Don't enable ULA IPv6 addresses by default in new config

2022-10-18 Thread Oldřich Jedlička
Hi, pá 9. 9. 2022 v 11:21 odesílatel Torsten Duwe napsal: > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 19:51:06 +0200 > Thibaut wrote: > > > The issue was random. The client had a GUA assigned, below is the ipv6 > > routing table at the time of the issue: > > > > $ ip -6 route > > 2a0e:e701:11c2::/64 dev bond0 proto

Re: [PATCH] base-files: Don't enable ULA IPv6 addresses by default in new config

2022-09-09 Thread Torsten Duwe
On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 19:51:06 +0200 Thibaut wrote: > The issue was random. The client had a GUA assigned, below is the ipv6 > routing table at the time of the issue: > > $ ip -6 route > 2a0e:e701:11c2::/64 dev bond0 proto kernel metric 256 expires 7082sec pref > medium > fdc9:6d06:832a::/64 dev

Re: [PATCH] base-files: Don't enable ULA IPv6 addresses by default in new config

2022-09-09 Thread Baptiste Jonglez
On 08-09-22, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > Baptiste Jonglez writes: > > - there have been various bug reports [1, 2, 3] in 19.07 and 21.02 > > where ULA addresses basically break global IPv6 connectivity. These > > bugs have not been solved in several years, indicating a probab

Re: [PATCH] base-files: Don't enable ULA IPv6 addresses by default in new config

2022-09-09 Thread Baptiste Jonglez
Hi, On 08-09-22, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > Baptiste Jonglez writes: > > ULA IPv6 prefixes (Unique Local Addresses, RFC 4193) are not routable > > on the Internet. As such, they have very limited use, and enabling > > them by default causes more problems than it solves: >

Re: [PATCH] base-files: Don't enable ULA IPv6 addresses by default in new config

2022-09-08 Thread Fernando Frediani
One of the first things I do when I bring up a new OpenWrt box is to disable ULA to the LAN as it has not usage in most scenarios I think. I basically use the IPv6 connectivity to receive a global prefix delegated from my ISP, install it on the LAN and bring global connectivity to devices behind

Re: [PATCH] base-files: Don't enable ULA IPv6 addresses by default in new config

2022-09-08 Thread Michael Richardson
> Baptiste Jonglez writes: > - there have been various bug reports [1, 2, 3] in 19.07 and 21.02 > where ULA addresses basically break global IPv6 connectivity. These > bugs have not been solved in several years, indicating a probable lack > of interest for ULA from the OpenWr

Re: [PATCH] base-files: Don't enable ULA IPv6 addresses by default in new config

2022-09-08 Thread Michael Richardson
> Baptiste Jonglez writes: > ULA IPv6 prefixes (Unique Local Addresses, RFC 4193) are not routable > on the Internet. As such, they have very limited use, and enabling > them by default causes more problems than it solves: > - if an OpenWrt device already has external IPv6 c

[PATCH] base-files: Don't enable ULA IPv6 addresses by default in new config

2022-09-08 Thread Baptiste Jonglez
From: Baptiste Jonglez ULA IPv6 prefixes (Unique Local Addresses, RFC 4193) are not routable on the Internet. As such, they have very limited use, and enabling them by default causes more problems than it solves: - if an OpenWrt device already has external IPv6 connectivity with globally rout