Le 03/04/2012 13:21, Brian J. Murrell a écrit :
On 12-04-03 04:52 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
I was wondering why hostapd (on cerowrt 3.3) ate so much cpu, even when
idle, nothing connected, no crypto enabled...
I'm curious as to if this is correct behavior, and what's the point of
writing 000s to /de
On 12-04-03 04:52 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I was wondering why hostapd (on cerowrt 3.3) ate so much cpu, even when
> idle, nothing connected, no crypto enabled...
>
> I'm curious as to if this is correct behavior, and what's the point of
> writing 000s to /dev/random,
Is it supposed to be feeding t
