How does one get Patchwork to properly associate an update or addendum
to an existing patch / series when sent from git send-email?
While I have set --in-reply-to=''
and see the In-Reply-To and References headers both prior to sending
as well as in the delivered messages, Patchwork failed to ass
Hi All,
2018-01-18 1:30 GMT-08:00 Piotr Dymacz :
> Hi,
>
> On 18.01.2018 09:44, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>>
>> Hi John, Alex,
>>
>> I have no problem with closing / autorejecting open tickets in patchwork
>> as long as they somehow remain available for future reference.
>
>
> ACK.
>
> Would it be po
Hi,
On 18.01.2018 09:44, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Hi John, Alex,
I have no problem with closing / autorejecting open tickets in patchwork
as long as they somehow remain available for future reference.
ACK.
Would it be possible to send the author short message why the patch was
auto closed/rej
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
I would like to close all ~1000 un-handled patches from the last 3 years
and only keep stuff from the last 6 months. any problem with that ?
No objections, if something was missed in the last 3 years (and is not in
trunk already), then it'd
Hi John, Alex,
I have no problem with closing / autorejecting open tickets in patchwork
as long as they somehow remain available for future reference.
> To add here. Would it be possible/desire-able to add an auto-timeout
> to patchwork & github PRs, issues to close after X time ? Maybe make
> it
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:31 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to close all ~1000 un-handled patches from the last 3 years and
> only keep stuff from the last 6 months. any problem with that ?
>
To add here.
Would it be possible/desire-able to add an auto-timeout to patchwork &
gith
Hi,
I would like to close all ~1000 un-handled patches from the last 3 years
and only keep stuff from the last 6 months. any problem with that ?
John
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin
On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 18:07 +0100, Pau wrote:
> this package is part
> of the openwrt-routing feed which is managed from another group of
> volunteers. Plese, visit https://github.com/openwrt-routing
PS, I note that this "OpenWrt Routing Organisation" lists
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org as its e
Hi Pau,
The patch I emailed is against the master branch of the openwrt-routing
repository. Can you apply that?
Regards,
Bob
On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 18:07 +0100, Pau wrote:
> Hello Bob.
>
> I think it has been set as "Not applicable" because this package is part
> of the openwrt-routing feed w
On 12/02/2016 11:43, Bob Ham wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 11:03 +0100, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
>> * Bob Ham [12.02.2016 11:00]:
>>> now has the state of "Not applicable" but there are no comments and it
>>> doesn't say who changed the status.
>>
>> what I see is, that
>> 'luci-app-bmx6/files/us
On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 11:03 +0100, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Bob Ham [12.02.2016 11:00]:
> > now has the state of "Not applicable" but there are no comments and it
> > doesn't say who changed the status.
>
> what I see is, that
> 'luci-app-bmx6/files/usr/lib/lua/luci/model/cbi/bmx6/main.lua' is
On 12/02/2016 10:54, Bob Ham wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've received a message from patchwork saying that this patch
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/576676/
>
> now has the state of "Not applicable" but there are no comments and it
> doesn't say who changed the status.
>
> Is there a way
* Bob Ham [12.02.2016 11:00]:
> now has the state of "Not applicable" but there are no comments and it
> doesn't say who changed the status.
what I see is, that
'luci-app-bmx6/files/usr/lib/lua/luci/model/cbi/bmx6/main.lua' is
at least does not belong to openwrt.git - you should send a pull-reque
Hi there,
I've received a message from patchwork saying that this patch
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/576676/
now has the state of "Not applicable" but there are no comments and it
doesn't say who changed the status.
Is there a way for me to find out who changed the status and why? Is
th
Patchwork failed to send confirmation email to my email address, for the
account cshore AND there is not password reset option, nor means to
re-request confirmation email AND it won't let me register an already
registered email address AND I can't login because the account is
'inactive' (probab
Brilliant, exactly what I was looking for. Thank you!
On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 17:29 +0200, Hannu Nyman wrote:
> Old patches seem to be quite intact at the old patchwork site, if you use
> directly the address to the patch list itself:
> http://patchwork.openwrt.org/project/openwrt/list/
>
> (plain
Old patches seem to be quite intact at the old patchwork site, if you use
directly the address to the patch list itself:
http://patchwork.openwrt.org/project/openwrt/list/
(plain patchwork.openwrt.org address seems to get redirected to the new site
at ozlabs)
On 19.12.2014 17:09, Ben Mulvihi
Hi,
Are the patches from the old patchwork (regardless of status)
accessible anywhere? They are sometimes a useful reference.
Many thanks,
Ben
On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 10:19 +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> patchwork has moved, to https://patchwork.ozlabs.org
>
> we would like express our
Hi,
patchwork has moved, to https://patchwork.ozlabs.org
we would like express our thanks to Jeremy for creating and maintaining
the patchwork project and also for being kind and hosting it for us.
we are using this move to also cleanup our queue as there are ~500 old
patches, some of which are
Hello everyone,
just to let you know, patchwork.openwrt.org seems to be dead - Internal server
error - http status code 500.
Jiri
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hello
I finally got around to take a look at this.
Thank you for setting this up.
Now, we only need a script to automatically review the patches ;)
Bernhard
2010/5/10 :
> Yes, great idea.
>
> i will be in berlin at the wcw on the weekend. there i will be meeting
> CyrusFF wh
Yes, great idea.
i will be in berlin at the wcw on the weekend. there i will be meeting
CyrusFF who is currently hosting the patchwork installation. i will
then discuss next steps with him and also talk to bartman/kaloz about
a dns entry pointing at that ip
i'll keep you updated.
--
Joh
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 10:44 +0200, j...@phrozen.org wrote:
> Quoting Raphaël HUCK :
>
> > Le Fri, 07 May 2010 12:24:29 +0200,
> > j...@phrozen.org a écrit :
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> http://patchwork.cyranjo.org
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >>
> >
This is really excellent.
It would be really good if it cou
Quoting Raphaël HUCK :
Le Fri, 07 May 2010 12:24:29 +0200,
j...@phrozen.org a écrit :
Hi,
http://patchwork.cyranjo.org
John
Hi John,
this is great! But why not http://patchwork.openwrt.org?
you probably missed the bit where i said we have it in testing
Also a problem with patchwork
Le Fri, 07 May 2010 12:24:29 +0200,
j...@phrozen.org a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> http://patchwork.cyranjo.org
>
> John
>
>
Hi John,
this is great! But why not http://patchwork.openwrt.org?
Also a problem with patchwork is that it exposes email adresses to
anyone with simple mailto: links in clear.
Hi,
http://patchwork.cyranjo.org
John
--
John Crispin
hacking, coding, etc
blogic on irc
___ __
| |.-.-.-.| | | |..| |_
| - || _ | -__| || | | || _|| _|
|___|| __|_|__|__||||__| |__
we already have one running
Quoting Jeremy Kerr :
Hello,
> Hello
> Is there any chance we could set up a patchwork server like the one
> the kernel has?
> I'm not sure, how much work this will be, but there are a significant
> number of patches send to openwrt-devel, which are more or less
Hello,
> > Hello
> > Is there any chance we could set up a patchwork server like the one
> > the kernel has?
> > I'm not sure, how much work this will be, but there are a significant
> > number of patches send to openwrt-devel, which are more or less
> > silently ignored, which is not very nice to
we have been testing patchwork internally for 3-4 weeks now, i thinki
we can make it public now, let me talk to the right people and see
what we can do .
Quoting Raphaël HUCK :
Le Thu, 6 May 2010 12:19:34 +0200,
Bernhard Loos a écrit :
Hello
Is there any chance we could set up a pa
From: Bernhard Loos
Date: 2010/5/6
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] patchwork for openwrt
To: Outback Dingo
well, there is this:
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2010-May/007019.html
then this:
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2010-April/006960.html
https
Le Thu, 6 May 2010 12:19:34 +0200,
Bernhard Loos a écrit :
> Hello
> Is there any chance we could set up a patchwork server like the one
> the kernel has?
> I'm not sure, how much work this will be, but there are a significant
> number of patches send to openwrt-devel, which are more or less
> si
Hello
Is there any chance we could set up a patchwork server like the one
the kernel has?
I'm not sure, how much work this will be, but there are a significant
number of patches send to openwrt-devel, which are more or less
silently ignored, which is not very nice to the authors and probably
even w
32 matches
Mail list logo
