Sorry, I didn't mean to offend or insult you and the other developers.
I realize you all have lives and are busy, and I sincerely appreciate
the time and effort you have all spent in developing OpenWRT. It's
just a bit frustrating to submit a patch and get no response, only to
see the ident
> picking my nose, waiting on a patch from you, so i can ignore it and
> then get back to picking my nose.
I doubt any of we who have submitted ignored updates feel that way,
and I'm sorry you think we do. The question I have is whether you
core devs would prefer patches submitted in a different
we all have real life jobs. look at the timeline in trac and you will
see, that patches, addons and new features are constantly being added.
you are definatley not wasting your time. just be patient, we are only
humans. each and every one of the devs invests a lot of time to develop
a great dis
I submitted the identical patch back on May 26, and it was ignored.
Am I just wasting my time sending in patches?
On Jun 11, 2008, at 1:03 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> applied, but forgot the signed off in the commit msg, sorry
>
> Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>> I'd like to propose the following pat
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 22:52 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
>
> who said it would or would not be merged ?
Nobody, either way. That it wasn't I took as meaning that it would not,
which is why I was asking why it wasn't. If that made any sense. :-)
So should I resubmit that or is it something not g
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> I see the above was applied, but not my proposal for a new hotplug iface
> script below. Do I need to submit it separately or is there
> philosophical objection to it?
who said it would or would not be merged ?
___
openwrt-dev
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 22:03 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> applied, but forgot the signed off in the commit msg, sorry
>
> Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > I'd like to propose the following patch to
> > package/ppp/files/etc/ppp/ip-up. It means that hotplug scripts can
> > source the network state and g
applied, but forgot the signed off in the commit msg, sorry
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> I'd like to propose the following patch to
> package/ppp/files/etc/ppp/ip-up. It means that hotplug scripts can
> source the network state and get information about the newly plumbed ppp
> interface.
>
> Signed
I'd like to propose the following patch to
package/ppp/files/etc/ppp/ip-up. It means that hotplug scripts can
source the network state and get information about the newly plumbed ppp
interface.
Signed off by: Brian J. Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: package/ppp/files/etc/ppp/ip-up
===
