On 29 May 2017 at 09:03, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that
> post remerge anything can be voted on, so clutterin
On 13/06/17 21:58, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/28/2017 11:56 PM, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering t
On 05/28/2017 11:56 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
> that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal
> with many details will d
Hi,
NACK from me - not that it makes a difference but I do not like to
operate under the OpenWrt name.
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Mon, 29 May 2017 09:03:57 +0200
John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the
> comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
> Please remeber that post remerge anything can be voted on, s
On 29.05.2017 09:03, John Crispin wrote:
(resend, this time as plain text)
Hi,
here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal
wi
On 29 May 2017 at 09:03, John Crispin wrote:
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that
> post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal with many
> details will delay th
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:03 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that
> post remerge anything can be voted on, so c
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 09:03:57AM +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that
> post remerge anything can be voted
On 05/29/2017 09:03 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
> that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering
On 29-05-17 09:03, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please
> remeber that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the
> p
On 05/29/2017 09:03 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
> that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering
On 29/05/17 10:39, Tom Psyborg wrote:
Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks
resources like a sieve and tends to slow down to a crawl under load.
Regards,
Jo
Could you be more specific? I don't see how can it leak resources.
About slow down, hav
> Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks
> resources like a sieve and tends to slow down to a crawl under load.
>
> Regards,
> Jo
>
>
Could you be more specific? I don't see how can it leak resources. About
slow down, have you ever chekced the server it is hosted on, or c
Hi Tom,
> I'd vote for re-enabling trac for all users, instead of wasting time and
> resources on another flyspray instance or even existing one which
> compared to trac does not bring any breakthrough features.
Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks
resources like a si
On 29 May 2017 at 08:56, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
>
> *) trac
> - trac is already readonly, keep content so that search engines can still
> find the it
> - edit t
(resend, this time as plain text)
Hi,
here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal
with many details will delay the remerge
Hi,
here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal
with many details will delay the remerge even more.
Ideally we manage to v
On 23/05/17 17:29, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
Hi John,
John Crispin wrote:
here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the
comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
[snip]
Please let us know when you'll start a final vote on this proposal, or
if you want to
Hi John,
John Crispin wrote:
here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
[snip]
Please let us know when you'll start a final vote on this proposal, or
if you want to wait a few days if anything bumps in for a
On 05/22/2017 02:02 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>> *) branding
>> - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
>> - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most
>> people said they did not care
>> - as the last vote had a
Sounds good to me!
On 22/05/2017 08:40, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
John
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) major
On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote:
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people
said they did not care
- as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a remerge using the owrt brand is the
only fe
Hi,
here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
John
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most
people s
On Thu, 11 May 2017, Martin Tippmann wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:27 PM, tapper wrote:
On 11/05/2017 09:30, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
The OpenWrt forum design looks a bit better than the landing page, but it
still feels too heavy due to the colored backgrounds.
Matthias
One more thing
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:27 PM, tapper wrote:
> On 11/05/2017 09:30, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>>
>> On 05/11/2017 12:17 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for moving this forward.
>>>
>>> On 05/08/2017 03:19 PM, John Crispin wrote:
*) github
>>>
>>> .
- obsolete
On 11/05/2017 09:30, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
On 05/11/2017 12:17 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Thanks for moving this forward.
On 05/08/2017 03:19 PM, John Crispin wrote:
*) github
.
- obsolete the lede github org after a grace period of 3-6 months
As long as it does not cost us effort I
[Some lists were dropped from this thread, adding again]
>
>>> According to the rules there shall be no personal mail accounts at all.
>>> There should be plenty of time until the actual remerge to fade them out
>>> and to set up forwarding elsewhere.
>>
>> I hope you agree that a merge means bo
On 05/11/2017 12:17 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> Thanks for moving this forward.
>
> On 05/08/2017 03:19 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>> *) github
> .
>>
>> - obsolete the lede github org after a grace period of 3-6 months
>
> As long as it does not cost us effort I would like to keep the lede
> doma
Hauke Mehrtens wrote on Wed May 10 15:17:37 PDT 2017:
> On 05/08/2017 03:19 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> > *) landing page
> > - update the lede landing page to represent the openwrt name
> > - update the landing page to have the same look & feel as the current
> > openwrt landing page
> > - point
Thanks for moving this forward.
On 05/08/2017 03:19 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> *) github
.
>
> - obsolete the lede github org after a grace period of 3-6 months
As long as it does not cost us effort I would like to keep the lede
domains and github project up running for longer.
> *) landing
So many items to vote and work on. I would suggest we sort out those
formal things first, e.g. project rules, umbrella project etc. I do
not know much about the past history apart from those posts in the
public mailing list. But if these formal things were the major cause
of the split in the fir
On 05/08/2017 06:19 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and
> discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we
> would like to propose and have people vote on.
>
> *) branding
> - the owrt side sees no option of
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:50 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 09/05/17 09:49, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>
>> On 8 May 2017 at 15:19, John Crispin wrote:
>>>
>>> *) domain
>>> - transfer owner ship to SPI for openwrt.org and lede-project.org
>>> (...)
>>>
>>> *) SPI
>>> - TBD post remerge
>>
>> This is
On 9 May 2017 at 09:50, John Crispin wrote:
> On 09/05/17 09:49, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>
>> On 8 May 2017 at 15:19, John Crispin wrote:
>>>
>>> *) domain
>>> - transfer owner ship to SPI for openwrt.org and lede-project.org
>>> (...)
>>>
>>> *) SPI
>>> - TBD post remerge
>>
>> This is unclear to
On 09/05/17 09:49, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 8 May 2017 at 15:19, John Crispin wrote:
*) domain
- transfer owner ship to SPI for openwrt.org and lede-project.org
(...)
*) SPI
- TBD post remerge
This is unclear to me. Are we postponing setting rules with SPI on how
they should manage domains?
On 8 May 2017 at 15:19, John Crispin wrote:
> *) domain
> - transfer owner ship to SPI for openwrt.org and lede-project.org
> (...)
>
> *) SPI
> - TBD post remerge
This is unclear to me. Are we postponing setting rules with SPI on how
they should manage domains? I guess it should be handled at th
On 08/05/17 15:29, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 15:19 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
*) mailing list
- ask david to add the openwrt-adm and openwrt lists
- announce the switch to the infradead serves, asking people to
unsubscribe if they have privacy issues with this
- import the u
On 2017-05-08 15:43, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
John Crispin writes:
Hi,
Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and discussed
the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to propose
and have people vote on.
Great to hear progress is be
John Crispin writes:
> Hi,
>
> Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and
> discussed
> the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to
> propose
> and have people vote on.
Great to hear progress is being made on this! I think the proposal l
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 15:19 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
>
> *) mailing list
> - ask david to add the openwrt-adm and openwrt lists
> - announce the switch to the infradead serves, asking people to
> unsubscribe if they have privacy issues with this
> - import the user DB from the current openwrt a
Hi,
Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and
discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we
would like to propose and have people vote on.
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for ope
42 matches
Mail list logo
