No, it is not!
David Woodhouse schrieb am Mi., 27. Juni 2018, 09:38:
> On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 00:52 +0200, Lev wrote:
> > Please note that this link is broken:
> >
> > https://lists.openwrt.org/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>
> Should be fixed now. Thanks.___
On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 10:22 +0200, Juergen Kimmel wrote:
> No, it is not!
Sorry, I should have been clearer...
The mailing list config is fixed now, so it doesn't have a broken link
in the footer.
The previous broken link (without "mailman/" in it) remains broken.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIM
On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 00:52 +0200, Lev wrote:
> Please note that this link is broken:
>
> https://lists.openwrt.org/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Should be fixed now. Thanks.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Please note that this link is broken:
https://lists.openwrt.org/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
Levente Kovacs
Senior Electronic Engineer
W: http://levente.logonex.eu
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/l
Peter,
I have Kamikaze 7.09 brcm-2.4 working with the "Option GT" mobile air
card using the hso interface, not the generic USB serial driver. I can
provide patches to get the driver into the kernel and "make menuconfig".
Bringing up the interface is a little different as well. I have working
i
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:51 PM, RB wrote:
>> Currently I am working on the brcm 2.4 build and was hoping to move to
>> the 2.6 kernel if the wifi and pcmcia support was resolved. I saw a
>> post in the forums saying wifi was reasonably stable so was going to
>> check out head and build and see h
> Currently I am working on the brcm 2.4 build and was hoping to move to
> the 2.6 kernel if the wifi and pcmcia support was resolved. I saw a
> post in the forums saying wifi was reasonably stable so was going to
> check out head and build and see how it goes.
I also did some work on the PCMCIA b
On 25/03/2009, at 5:23 AM, RB wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 18:47, Peter Lambrechtsen
> wrote:
>> The below link is broken:
>>
>> http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware/Linksys/WRT54G3G
>
> Known issue - I broke it and have a much-updated version of the page
> waiting to be inserted
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 18:47, Peter Lambrechtsen
wrote:
> The below link is broken:
>
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware/Linksys/WRT54G3G
Known issue - I broke it and have a much-updated version of the page
waiting to be inserted. Brokenness aside, I'd be interested in what
you're d
Posted on the forums and the response was null, so thought I would
post here instead.
The below link is broken:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware/Linksys/WRT54G3G
Can someone please restore the old version:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware/Linksys/WRT54G3G?action=recall&r
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Harald Schiöberg wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> > but if you go into feeds/packages, do you see the following?
> >
> > drwxrwxr-x 9 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 admin
> > drwxrwxr-x 15 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 ipv6
> > drwxr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> but if you go into feeds/packages, do you see the following?
>
> drwxrwxr-x 9 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 admin
> drwxrwxr-x 15 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 ipv6
> drwxrwxr-x 24 rpjday rpjday 4096 2008-03-17 12:39 lang
> drwxrwxr
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Harald Schiöberg wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i'm not sure what it's doing there, but in my current build
> > infrastructure, i have the (broken) symlink:
> >
> > package/openwrt-packages/packages -> ../feeds/pack
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Harald Schiöberg wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i'm not sure what it's doing there, but in my current build
> > infrastructure, i have the (broken) symlink:
> >
> > package/openwrt-packages/packages -> ../feeds/pack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i'm not sure what it's doing there, but in my current build
> infrastructure, i have the (broken) symlink:
>
> package/openwrt-packages/packages -> ../feeds/packages
>
> it doesn't appear to be doing any harm, but it jus
i'm not sure what it's doing there, but in my current build
infrastructure, i have the (broken) symlink:
package/openwrt-packages/packages -> ../feeds/packages
it doesn't appear to be doing any harm, but it just as clearly isn't
doing any good. i'm guessing it's a holdover from days gone by
16 matches
Mail list logo
