> Hi Juan,
>
> Le mardi 1 avril 2008, Juan I. González a écrit :
> > :( sorry I don't have this ploblem :?
>
> Your patch was really malformed, for the last change, it should have been :
>
> +@@ -268,11 +285,11 @@
> instead of :
> +@@ -268,11 +320,11 @@
>
> Anyway, applied in changeset 10710.
>
Hi Juan,
Le mardi 1 avril 2008, Juan I. González a écrit :
> :( sorry I don't have this ploblem :?
Your patch was really malformed, for the last change, it should have been :
+@@ -268,11 +285,11 @@
instead of :
+@@ -268,11 +320,11 @@
Anyway, applied in changeset 10710.
Thanks !
--
Best regard
> Le lundi 31 mars 2008, Juan I. González a écrit :
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In these days I adapted the last patch for br2684 kernel module.
>
> This is great work. However, I get an error while applying your patch :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~/../trunk]$ patch -p0 --dry-run <
> br2684_route_support.di
Hi Juan,
Le lundi 31 mars 2008, Juan I. González a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> In these days I adapted the last patch for br2684 kernel module.
This is great work. However, I get an error while applying your patch :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~/../trunk]$ patch -p0 --dry-run < br2684_route_support.diff
patchi
Hi All,
In these days I adapted the last patch for br2684 kernel module.
For some ISP it is necesary this implementation.
This is my case in Spain with Telefonica ISP and static IP.
Adapted support for kernel 2.6.24
Implemented:
-
Ke
