On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:43:43 +0200
"Ithamar R. Adema" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 15:05 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > Actually this is normal. Order is base-files, then
> > target/base-files, then packages. It's doing
> > target/base-files/etc/config/fstab that is wrong because
Hi,
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 15:05 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Actually this is normal. Order is base-files, then target/base-files,
> then packages. It's doing target/base-files/etc/config/fstab that is
> wrong because block-mount is not base-files. It looks like a
> target-specific hack to
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:09:07 +0200
"Ithamar R. Adema" wrote:
> >
> > Do you also remove the $(INTALL_DATA) ./files/fstab.config
> > $(1)/etc/config/fstab ?
> >
> > If not then the file should still be installed regardless of the
> > conffiles. AFAIK conffiles just says don't overwrite if it a
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 12:20 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:14:42 +0200
> "Ithamar R. Adema" wrote:
> > If a target has a /etc/config/fstab file in its base-files
> > (target/linux/$(TARGET)/base-files/etc/config/fstab) and has
> > block-mount as package enabled
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:14:42 +0200
"Ithamar R. Adema" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After a recent upgrade to latest Backfire I bumped into an interesting
> problem.
>
> If a target has a /etc/config/fstab file in its base-files
> (target/linux/$(TARGET)/base-files/etc/config/fstab) and has
> block-mount
Hello,
After a recent upgrade to latest Backfire I bumped into an interesting
problem.
If a target has a /etc/config/fstab file in its base-files
(target/linux/$(TARGET)/base-files/etc/config/fstab) and has block-mount
as package enabled, it will get the fstab file from the block-mount
package in
