On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-September/012184.html
Right, that's basically the same modification I was trying too..
except it doesn't compile:
$ make package/mtd/compile V=s
[...]
ccache_cc [...] -c -o mtd.o mtd.c
On 22 October 2012 09:19, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Catalin Patulea [2012-10-21 14:26:58]:
>
>> I noticed that many of the system scripts use mtd, so to reflect this
>> in the package metadata I tried to make mtd a dependency of
>> base-files. This would mean that if you select base-files, you also
>
Catalin Patulea [2012-10-21 14:26:58]:
> I noticed that many of the system scripts use mtd, so to reflect this
> in the package metadata I tried to make mtd a dependency of
> base-files. This would mean that if you select base-files, you also
> get mtd, achieving the same effect as making mtd man
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Catalin Patulea wrote:
> Hope this helps :) If anyone knows some of the philosophy behind this,
> I would be happy to hack away at some patches, but as it stands, I
> don't have much to go on.
An interesting example is myloader.h. It lives in
(platform-independent)
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Ok, sorry. I've meant "mtd" package, but wrote "mtd-utils". Anyway, the
> conditions metioned in my previous email still apply. Without that "mtd"
> package it's not possible to use jffs2 /overlay.
I noticed that many of the system scripts use
Jo-Philipp Wich [2012-10-21 15:17:35]:
> "mtd" is in the "mtd" package, not "mtd-utils".
Ok, sorry. I've meant "mtd" package, but wrote "mtd-utils". Anyway, the
conditions metioned in my previous email still apply. Without that "mtd"
package it's not possible to use jffs2 /overlay.
-- ynezz
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"mtd" is in the "mtd" package, not "mtd-utils".
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlCD598ACgkQdputYINPTPN9xgCfRq2BEieU5Zp6RdL90yMW5zz/
/WUAn26uYI5N
Hi,
while doing some testing of new firmware image yesterday, I've noticed, that
no jffs2 overlay has been used, but just ramfs overlay. I've tracked it down
to the lib/preinit/40_mount_jffs2 script:
find_mount_jffs2() {
mkdir -p /tmp/overlay
mount "$(find_
