On 11/19/10 12:34 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:25:42 +0100, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
Some of the new or upcoming Atom and Bobcat cores may not use this size either,
so I think you might be assuming too much.
Sure, you are're absolutely right to assume they will rebase
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:25:42 +0100, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
Some of the new or upcoming Atom and Bobcat cores may not use this size either,
so I think you might be assuming too much.
Sure, you are're absolutely right to assume they will rebase next-gen designs
on older microarchitect
On 11/18/10 12:24 PM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:35:58 +0100, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
On 11/18/10 2:02 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:18:51 +0100, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
Having CONFIG_X86_GENERIC in target/linux/x86/config-default obscures
CONFIG_MGEODE_
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:35:58 +0100, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
On 11/18/10 2:02 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:18:51 +0100, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
Having CONFIG_X86_GENERIC in target/linux/x86/config-default obscures
CONFIG_MGEODE_LX, etc. and caused wrong cache-line size
On 11/18/10 2:02 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:18:51 +0100, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
Having CONFIG_X86_GENERIC in target/linux/x86/config-default obscures
CONFIG_MGEODE_LX, etc. and caused wrong cache-line size.
Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville
---
IMHO target/linux/x86
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:18:51 +0100, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
Having CONFIG_X86_GENERIC in target/linux/x86/config-default obscures
CONFIG_MGEODE_LX, etc. and caused wrong cache-line size.
Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville
---
IMHO target/linux/x86/config-default should be left alone and
Having CONFIG_X86_GENERIC in target/linux/x86/config-default obscures
CONFIG_MGEODE_LX, etc. and caused wrong cache-line size.
Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville
---
Index: target/linux/x86/net5501/config-default
===
--- target/li
