Hi,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:19:36 +0200, Chris Blake
> wrote:
>
>> Yep, currently my apm821xx target on the repo is based on the 4.4
>> kernel, and has a few small patches in place for the ar8035 NIC, and a
>> patch for fixing the Crypt
Hi,
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:19:36 +0200, Chris Blake
wrote:
Yep, currently my apm821xx target on the repo is based on the 4.4
kernel, and has a few small patches in place for the ar8035 NIC, and a
patch for fixing the Crypto driver for the apm821xx hardware. [0]
Did you try to send these u
Hi Imre,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:00:19 +0200, Chris Blake
> wrote:
>
>> Quick Question about the ppc44x target. I am currently working on
>> porting over a PowerPC Device that uses the APM821XX SoC (464-based)
>> but the closest c
Hi Chris,
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:00:19 +0200, Chris Blake
wrote:
Quick Question about the ppc44x target. I am currently working on
porting over a PowerPC Device that uses the APM821XX SoC (464-based)
but the closest current target would be ppc44x, which seems to be a
bit outdated and lacks
Hello everyone,
Quick Question about the ppc44x target. I am currently working on
porting over a PowerPC Device that uses the APM821XX SoC (464-based)
but the closest current target would be ppc44x, which seems to be a
bit outdated and lacks support for some system level integration
(LED's, sysupg
