Ok, got it. Thank you for all your answers.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Jiří Šlachta wrote:
> Hi Federico,
>
> I would say you can take over maintainership without asking anyone. There
> is no formal maintainer for this package and git history shows that this
> package was maintained by almo
Hi Federico,
I would say you can take over maintainership without asking anyone. There
is no formal maintainer for this package and git history shows that this
package was maintained by almost all devs through the time. Just create
pull request against the packages repository in github and it will
:) Ok got it, just to be sure before "stealing" others' work is there
anybody willing to maintain neon library ? From SVN jow (I do not know
his/her email) is the last one who modified neon package, could
someone please ask him/her if he/she is willing sooner or later to
upload neon library to Git
On 3 Sep 2014 04:21, "Federico Di Marco" wrote:
>
> Well shouldn't there already be assigned a maintaner ?
They were never set in stone.
This is why we started over.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.or
Well shouldn't there already be assigned a maintaner ?
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 14:54:20 CEST, Hannu Nyman wrote:
To my knowledge those packages (e.g. neon) have never been imported to the
new "packages" in Github.
They are still in the old packages repo in svn, better known now as
"oldpackages".
No
To my knowledge those packages (e.g. neon) have never been imported to the
new "packages" in Github.
They are still in the old packages repo in svn, better known now as
"oldpackages".
None of the packages have been imported automatically. Transferring any
package from oldpackages to Github req
Hi,
I have noticed that the GITHUB repository of package feed (
https://github.com/openwrt/packages ) some packages which had already
been ported to Openwrt are missing (e.g. libs/neon, net/lftp,
net/sshfs, etc.) and instead they are present in the SVN repository (
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/
