True. Perhaps that makes it a moot issue for BB.
But I dont think it would hurt to be ahead of the curve in this day and age...
I am not the only one adding this latent protection to MIPS:
https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/994006/
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02430.html (s
On 2014-10-03 19:14, Catalin Patulea wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Andrew McDonnell
> wrote:
>> It seems that OpenWRT sets the relevant flag to require uClibc to build with
>> NOEXECSTACK set. This is good. (For one introduction to NOEXECSTACK, see
>> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Harden
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Andrew McDonnell
wrote:
> It seems that OpenWRT sets the relevant flag to require uClibc to build with
> NOEXECSTACK set. This is good. (For one introduction to NOEXECSTACK, see
> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Hardened/GNU_stack_quickstart )
Does anything actually en
Hi,
I have been taking a look at some of the OpenWRT security hardening and
discovered something puzzling.
It seems that OpenWRT sets the relevant flag to require uClibc to build with
NOEXECSTACK set. This is good. (For one introduction to NOEXECSTACK, see
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Harden
