gt; > -Original Message-
>> > From: openwrt-devel
>[mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
>> > On Behalf Of Hauke Mehrtens
>> > Sent: Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2019 14:49
>> > To: Daniel Golle ; m...@adrianschmutzler.de
>> > Cc: Marti
ke Mehrtens
> > Sent: Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2019 14:49
> > To: Daniel Golle ; m...@adrianschmutzler.de
> > Cc: Martin Blumenstingl ; openwrt-
> > de...@lists.openwrt.org
> > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Lantiq DTS rename
> >
> > On 12/15/19 2:27 PM
Behalf Of Hauke Mehrtens
>> Sent: Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2019 14:49
>> To: Daniel Golle ; m...@adrianschmutzler.de
>> Cc: Martin Blumenstingl ; openwrt-
>> de...@lists.openwrt.org
>> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Lantiq DTS rename
>>
>> On 12/15/19 2:27 PM,
r 2019 14:49
> To: Daniel Golle ; m...@adrianschmutzler.de
> Cc: Martin Blumenstingl ; openwrt-
> de...@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Lantiq DTS rename
>
> On 12/15/19 2:27 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 02
On 12/15/19 2:27 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 02:10:14PM +0100, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I consider doing a DTS rename for lantiq target similar to what it's like on
>> ath79 and what I did for ramips earlier that year.
>>
>> However, I wond
Hi Adrian,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 02:10:14PM +0100, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I consider doing a DTS rename for lantiq target similar to what it's like on
> ath79 and what I did for ramips earlier that year.
>
> However, I wonder whether the "soc_vendor_model.dts" scheme is use
Hi,
I consider doing a DTS rename for lantiq target similar to what it's like on
ath79 and what I did for ramips earlier that year.
However, I wonder whether the "soc_vendor_model.dts" scheme is useful there, or
whether it wouldn't be better to just use "vendor_model.dts" ...
Any thoughts on t
