On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 00:16 +0300, Hannu Nyman wrote:
> The current buildbot run was the first after the default feed change, and as
> "oldpackages" are not built by buildbot, many packages will be missing from
> the snapshot directory as of today... So I expect to see a flow of bugs for
> missi
The current buildbot run was the first after the default feed change, and as
"oldpackages" are not built by buildbot, many packages will be missing from
the snapshot directory as of today... So I expect to see a flow of bugs for
missing binary packages :-(
How are you going to ease the transit
>btw. What is the policy on pushing on that repository? Should be
>commits
>restricted to the maintained packages or extend to any possible
>package?
You can commit / propose (via pull request) any packages you want to maintain
as long as the packaged version is still supported upstream and ha
On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 13:25 +0200, Steven Barth wrote:
> Hello Developers,
>
> it has been some time since our latest stable release, so we are
> currently busy preparing the first RC for Barrier Breaker. But before we
> want to do the actual builds we need to take care of the packages feed
> w
Hello Developers,
it has been some time since our latest stable release, so we are
currently busy preparing the first RC for Barrier Breaker. But before we
want to do the actual builds we need to take care of the packages feed
which has been neglected for a quite a while. A lot of packages are
