Il giorno mar, 05/08/2008 alle 18.47 +0200, Felix Fietkau ha scritto:
> The WDS thing is fixable in madwifi. I will eventually add compatibility
> for Broadcom WDS when I find the time.
Thanks a lot. Remember me to buy you a beer (or mail you a spare router,
the beer might get warm while shipping
Alberto Botti wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 05/08/2008 alle 15.52 +0200, Felix Fietkau ha scritto:
>> It doesn't work between Broadcom and Atheros yet. But if you use only
>> Atheros devices, then WPA-PSK will work. I've tested both WPA and WPA2.
>
> Thanks. Is it a specific limitation of the Broadcom h
Il giorno mar, 05/08/2008 alle 15.52 +0200, Felix Fietkau ha scritto:
> It doesn't work between Broadcom and Atheros yet. But if you use only
> Atheros devices, then WPA-PSK will work. I've tested both WPA and WPA2.
Thanks. Is it a specific limitation of the Broadcom hardware (or its
crappy binary
Alberto Botti wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 05/08/2008 alle 09.19 +0200, Felix Fietkau ha scritto:
>
>> If you're talking about madwifi, then simply put up an AP on the side
>> that talks to multiple WDS peers.
>> On the other side, simply add a regular sta interface.
>> Make sure that you grab the late
Il giorno mar, 05/08/2008 alle 09.19 +0200, Felix Fietkau ha scritto:
> If you're talking about madwifi, then simply put up an AP on the side
> that talks to multiple WDS peers.
> On the other side, simply add a regular sta interface.
> Make sure that you grab the latest trunk (some more fixes jus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as far as I've understood there have been changes in the wds area.
> Which is the proper way to setup wds now? For example how should I
> translate the following config:
If you're talking about madwifi, then simply put up an AP on the side
that talks to multiple
Hi,
as far as I've understood there have been changes in the wds area.
Which is the proper way to setup wds now? For example how should I
translate the following config:
config wifi-iface
option device "wifi0"
option network "lan"
option mode"ap"
o
