Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ARMv4 (not v4t) marked obsolete in gcc-6

2016-03-15 Thread John Crispin
On 15/03/2016 16:59, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 11 March 2016 17:56:12 Hans Ulli Kroll wrote: >> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote: >>> On 2016-03-11 08:48, John Crispin wrote: On 11/03/2016 06:44, Hans Ulli Kroll wrote: > >>> As to the numbers I think that people like me (or

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ARMv4 (not v4t) marked obsolete in gcc-6

2016-03-11 Thread Hans Ulli Kroll
HI On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote: > On 2016-03-11 08:48, John Crispin wrote: > > On 11/03/2016 06:44, Hans Ulli Kroll wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > > > * Gemini: officially supported in OpenWRT today, with the latest > > > > compiler. This one > > > > will likely cause the most issue

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ARMv4 (not v4t) marked obsolete in gcc-6

2016-03-10 Thread John Crispin
On 11/03/2016 06:44, Hans Ulli Kroll wrote: > Hi >> >> * Gemini: officially supported in OpenWRT today, with the latest compiler. >> This one >> will likely cause the most issues for actual users. It would be helpful to >> get >> some numbers about users or downloads here, to see whether it

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ARMv4 (not v4t) marked obsolete in gcc-6

2016-03-10 Thread Hans Ulli Kroll
Hi > > * Gemini: officially supported in OpenWRT today, with the latest compiler. > This one > will likely cause the most issues for actual users. It would be helpful to > get > some numbers about users or downloads here, to see whether it can be dropped > in a future OpenWRT release or if