Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 6to4 as a secondary tunnel

2011-02-03 Thread ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto)
>>> Can I assume openwrt supports multiple routing tables? >> >> do you mean if OpenWRT supports to configure multiple routing tables >> with the UCI schemas ? > > Yes. Or, if it does not, what could the best way to support this > particular case. I'm also interested in knowing this :) Right now I

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 6to4 as a secondary tunnel

2011-02-02 Thread Łukasz Stelmach
"ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto)" writes: >> Can I assume openwrt supports multiple routing tables? > > do you mean if OpenWRT supports to configure multiple routing tables > with the UCI schemas ? Yes. Or, if it does not, what could the best way to support this particular case. -- Było mi bardzo mił

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 6to4 as a secondary tunnel

2011-02-02 Thread ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto)
> Can I assume openwrt supports multiple routing tables? do you mean if OpenWRT supports to configure multiple routing tables with the UCI schemas ? Saverio ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman

[OpenWrt-Devel] 6to4 as a secondary tunnel

2011-02-01 Thread Łukasz Stelmach
Hello. I've got a situation I would like to solve as neatly as possible and contribute to OpenWRT. This is the picture. I've got a: 1. DSL line at home with a dynamic IPv4 address. 2. TL-WR1043ND router running OpenWRT (pppoe). 3. tunnel to SiXXS. I'd like to: 1. set up 6to4 tunnel for better c