Matthias May wrote:
> root@CHD500279:/# echo 0x40d8 >
> /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy6/ath9k/regidx
> root@CHD500279:/# cat /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy6/ath9k/regval
> 0x0004
>
> On another device showing the same behaviour (but with various other
> patches and based on compat-wireless
Matthias May wrote:
> I'm in the position where i want to use a 9390 as 2x2 instead of 3x3.
> I use backports-3.12-1.
> I've set the rx and tx mask in eeprom to 0x5.
0x5 is not a valid chainmask on AR9390. The official statement is:
"We intentionally didn’t productize the chain mask of 0x5 on AR9
Matthias May wrote:
> I'm in the position where i want to use a 9390 as 2x2 instead of 3x3.
> I use backports-3.12-1.
> I've set the rx and tx mask in eeprom to 0x5.
> Every 30 seconds there is a short disconnect.
> Enabling some logging in
> echo "0x050C" > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath
Alex Hacker wrote:
> Thank you Sujith. Probably I understood the following patch in a wrong way.
> Felix removed all chain masks checking. If the mask 5 is invalid, how about
> the mask 4 and 6?
The patch is correct. For calibration, the mask that is calibrated in
the EEPROM has to be used. Even i
Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> You are talking about ar9003_phy.c -> ar9003_hw_set_chain_masks? No, the
> device is 3x3 and ah->caps.tx_chainmask & ah->caps.rx_chainmask are 7 and not
> 5. The AR_PHY_ANALOG_SWAP := AR_PHY_SWAP_ALT_CHAIN is only done when one of
> them would be 5. But I am not really su
On Friday 08 November 2013 18:33:19 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hm, is the 0x5 chainmask triggering the ALT_CHAIN logic?
You are talking about ar9003_phy.c -> ar9003_hw_set_chain_masks? No, the
device is 3x3 and ah->caps.tx_chainmask & ah->caps.rx_chainmask are 7 and not
5. The AR_PHY_ANALOG_SWAP := A
Hm, is the 0x5 chainmask triggering the ALT_CHAIN logic?
What are you trying to do? Control the receive antenna config, or the
transmit antenna config?
-a
On 8 November 2013 16:32, Julius Schulz-Zander
wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> I've asked nbd about this some time ago. It doesn't work if you have
Hi Sven,
I've asked nbd about this some time ago. It doesn't work if you have gaps in
the chain mask! Try chain mask 3 (110) and it should work with 2x2.
Regards,
-Julius
On 06.11.2013, at 16:04, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've needed to test some problems with a QCA9558 Rev 0 based 3x