On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:03:29AM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
> I'm not finding documentation but it looks to me like the return 1
> signifies that you have consumed that param and it shouldn't be sent to
> other init functions. Like you I looked at other code and found them to
> all return 1 so did
Luka,
I'm not finding documentation but it looks to me like the return 1
signifies that you have consumed that param and it shouldn't be sent to
other init functions. Like you I looked at other code and found them to
all return 1 so did the same.
Personally the right way to disable L2X0 is to ju
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:03:55PM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
> L2 cache via L2X0 cache controller available on some ARM boards can
> provide a performance boost in some situations but decrease performance
> in others. This adds a kernel cmdline to disable L2X0 for the Laguna
> product family.
>
>
L2 cache via L2X0 cache controller available on some ARM boards can
provide a performance boost in some situations but decrease performance
in others. This adds a kernel cmdline to disable L2X0 for the Laguna
product family.
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey
---
.../patches-3.3/480-laguna_l2cache_cmdli