Sorry, but wrong thread. This is just 3.1, Gabor is seems to be maintaining 3.2.
Weedy schrieb:
> Big nasty FYI, NAND (ie mikrotik profile) is broken.
>
>
> make[5]: Leaving directory
> `/home/weedy/openwrt/build_dir/linux-ar71xx_nand/linux-3.2.1'
>
> LZMA 4.65 : Igor Pavlov : Public domain : 2009
Big nasty FYI, NAND (ie mikrotik profile) is broken.
make[5]: Leaving directory
`/home/weedy/openwrt/build_dir/linux-ar71xx_nand/linux-3.2.1'
LZMA 4.65 : Igor Pavlov : Public domain : 2009-02-03
drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c: In function 'cfi_amdstd_write_words':
include/linux/mtd/map.h:33
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 01/18/12 08:47, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Otto Solares Cabrera
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
juhosg was working quite hard to get
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:19:45AM +0100, Gabor Juhos wrote:
> 2012.01.18. 4:42 keltezéssel, Otto Solares Cabrera írta:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> >> juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with decent support
> >> of nbd ;-) It took me a whi
On 18/01/12 04:24 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 01/18/12 08:47, Dave Taht wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Otto Solares Cabrera
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with dece
On Jan 18, 2012, at 2:47 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Otto Solares Cabrera wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
>>> juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with decent support of
>>> nbd ;-) It took me a while, but we'
Otto Solares Cabrera schrieb:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
>> juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with decent support of
>> nbd ;-) It took me a while, but we're finally back on the track. Minimum
>> kernel version is probably still 3.1.1. Suc
Hello,
On 01/18/12 08:47, Dave Taht wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Otto Solares Cabrera wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with decent support of nbd
;-) It took me a while, but we're finally ba
2012.01.18. 4:42 keltezéssel, Otto Solares Cabrera írta:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
>> juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with decent support of
>> nbd ;-) It took me a while, but we're finally back on the track. Minimum
>> kernel version i
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Otto Solares Cabrera wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
>> juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with decent support of
>> nbd ;-) It took me a while, but we're finally back on the track. Minimum
>> kernel vers
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with decent support of
> nbd ;-) It took me a while, but we're finally back on the track. Minimum
> kernel version is probably still 3.1.1. Successfully tested with kernel 3.1.4
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with decent support of
> nbd ;-) It took me a while, but we're finally back on the track. Minimum
> kernel version is probably still 3.1.1. Successfully tested with kernel 3.1.4
> on a
12 matches
Mail list logo
