Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] ath79: add support for Netgear WNDR4300 v2

2019-12-21 Thread Michal Cieslakiewicz
Hello David! > > Do you know if there is a hard limit to the kernel size? OpenWrt does > not support relocation of UBI as doing so would interfere with wear > leveling. This means the kernel size is more or less fixed if we want > to be able to use sysupgrade. > AFAIK there is no problem with i

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] ath79: add support for Netgear WNDR4300 v2

2019-12-21 Thread David Bauer
Hello Michal, On 12/21/19 2:54 PM, Michal Cieslakiewicz wrote: > 1. NAND Flash (128 MiB) layout under OpenWrt is changed as follows: >all space is assigned to 'firmware' partition which is divided into >2 MiB kernel and 126 MiB UBI areas; vendor partitions (language and >mtdoops) are r

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] ath79: add support for Netgear WNDR4300 v2

2019-12-21 Thread Michal Cieslakiewicz
This patch introduces support for Netgear WNDR4300v2. Specification = * Description: Netgear WNDR4300 v2 * Loader: U-boot * SOC: Qualcomm Atheros QCA9563 (775 MHz) * RAM: 128 MiB * Flash: 2 MiB SPI-NOR + 128 MiB SPI-NAND - NOR: U-boot binary: 256 KiB - NOR: U-

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] ath79: add support for Netgear WNDR4300 v2

2019-12-21 Thread Michal Cieslakiewicz
This patch introduces support for Netgear WNDR4300v2. Specification = * Description: Netgear WNDR4300 v2 * Loader: U-boot * SOC: Qualcomm Atheros QCA9563 (775 MHz) * RAM: 128 MiB * Flash: 2 MiB SPI-NOR + 128 MiB SPI-NAND - NOR: U-boot binary: 256 KiB - NOR: U-