On 5/16/20 3:38 AM, Paul Spooren wrote:
> Could we use that for the SDK/ImageBuilder as well?
>
> Best,
> Paul
Sure, have some benchmark results with the current ath79 snapshot IB:
* openwrt-imagebuilder-ath79-generic.Linux-x86_64.tar: 515M
* xz -7e (current implementation): 96M, ~100s
* zstd -3
Could we use that for the SDK/ImageBuilder as well?
Best,
Paul
--
May 13, 2020 9:20:39 AM Matthias Schiffer
:
zstd with its default settings (compression level -3) compresses better
than bzip2 -9 (which is the default setting), and is an order of
magnitude
faster.
I made the following mea
śr., 13 maj 2020 o 21:19 Matthias Schiffer
napisał(a):
>
> zstd with its default settings (compression level -3) compresses better
> than bzip2 -9 (which is the default setting), and is an order of magnitude
> faster.
>
> I made the following measurements for the most common compression tools
> (a
zstd with its default settings (compression level -3) compresses better
than bzip2 -9 (which is the default setting), and is an order of magnitude
faster.
I made the following measurements for the most common compression tools
(all standard Debian Buster versions, default flags unless noted
otherw
