On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 20:09:14 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2015-08-07 18:50, Mathieu Olivari wrote:
Actually, I was asking myself the same questions yesterday. I was
leaning
towards dts for the reasons you mention below as well; the problem is
on ref
designs, there is no "standard" layout.
On 2015-08-07 18:50, Mathieu Olivari wrote:
> Actually, I was asking myself the same questions yesterday. I was leaning
> towards dts for the reasons you mention below as well; the problem is on ref
> designs, there is no "standard" layout. The flash layout changes with time
> (an AP148 with an old
Actually, I was asking myself the same questions yesterday. I was leaning
towards dts for the reasons you mention below as well; the problem is on ref
designs, there is no "standard" layout. The flash layout changes with time
(an AP148 with an old boot binary blob will have a different layout than
On 2015-08-07 04:28, Mathieu Olivari wrote:
> This patch serie adds support for the integrated NAND flash controller
> available on AP148. Most of the patches are backported from LKML, with
> minor modifications.
>
> This is kernel level support & enablement for now. Support for proper
> MTD parti
This patch serie adds support for the integrated NAND flash controller
available on AP148. Most of the patches are backported from LKML, with
minor modifications.
This is kernel level support & enablement for now. Support for proper
MTD partitioning will come later and will be necessary to boot fr
