HI,
I too think that making host route installation dependent on the fwmark
option is not intuitive.
> So maybe we can add an explicit option 'nohostroute' instead of making
> it depend on 'fwmark'?
A "nohostroute" (I'd prefer "peerroute" with default "1") would make
sense imho. It should also b
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 04:31:25PM +0800, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 23:53, Daniel Golle wrote:
> >
> > The 'fwmark' option is used to define routing traffic to
> > wireguard endpoints to go through specific routing tables.
> > In that case it doesn't make sense to setup routes f
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 23:53, Daniel Golle wrote:
>
> The 'fwmark' option is used to define routing traffic to
> wireguard endpoints to go through specific routing tables.
> In that case it doesn't make sense to setup routes for
> host-dependencies in the 'main' table, so skip setting host
> depen
The 'fwmark' option is used to define routing traffic to
wireguard endpoints to go through specific routing tables.
In that case it doesn't make sense to setup routes for
host-dependencies in the 'main' table, so skip setting host
dependencies if 'fwmark' is set.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle
---
