On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:27:04 +0100 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >> NAK, it is a general pattern of daemons to be installed in disabled
> >> state, to prevent a default config causing security or other issues.
> >
> > I understand it, but, for example, igmpproxy is not disabled by default.
> > Besides u
On 14 February 2016 at 15:20, Nerijus Baliunas
wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:08:07 +0100 John Crispin wrote:
>
>> NAK, it is a general pattern of daemons to be installed in disabled
>> state, to prevent a default config causing security or other issues.
>
> I understand it, but, for example, ig
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:08:07 +0100 John Crispin wrote:
> NAK, it is a general pattern of daemons to be installed in disabled
> state, to prevent a default config causing security or other issues.
I understand it, but, for example, igmpproxy is not disabled by default.
Besides udpxy is not access
On 13/02/2016 23:44, Nerijus Baliūnas wrote:
> This patch changes option disabled to '0' as the package has init file and
> could be made disabled in System->Startup. It is difficult for new users
> to edit /etc/config/udpxy manually.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nerijus Baliūnas
>
NAK, it is a general
This patch changes option disabled to '0' as the package has init file and
could be made disabled in System->Startup. It is difficult for new users
to edit /etc/config/udpxy manually.
Signed-off-by: Nerijus Baliūnas
---
diff --git a/net/udpxy/files/udpxy.conf b/net/udpxy/files/udpxy.conf
index 9