On 19. 11. 26. 1:45 AM, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
Based on that, having dts-v1 in the dtsi is discouraged when it's in the dts
already (though not restricted by the parser ATM).
I see. So dtc does not really like the use of /dts-v1/ in DTSI files.
Thanks for letting me know. :)
__
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On
> Behalf Of mans0n
> Sent: Montag, 25. November 2019 17:33
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: Adrian Schmutzler
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] tr
Hi Adrian,
I already read your previous mail two weeks ago, but then I was not very
familiar with these mailing list stuff (still I am). Sorry for the late
reply.
On 19. 11. 25. 6:53 AM, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> The "/dts-v1/;" identifier is supposed to be put once at the beginning
> of a d
The "/dts-v1/;" identifier is supposed to be put once at the beginning
of a device tree file. Thus, it makes no sense to provide it a second
time in to-be-included DTSI files.
This removes the identifier from all DTSI files in /target/linux.
Most of the DTS files in OpenWrt do contain the "/dts-v
