On 08/12/11 21:34, Karl P wrote:
>
> On 12/03/2011 05:14 PM, ka...@tweak.net.au wrote:
>>
>> On 11/30/2011 03:37 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> This patch is an update of http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/1452/
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the patch is essentially fine, however there are whitespace er
On 12/03/2011 05:14 PM, ka...@tweak.net.au wrote:
On 11/30/2011 03:37 PM, John Crispin wrote:
This patch is an update of http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/1452/
Hi,
the patch is essentially fine, however there are whitespace errors.
can you please use tabs for indenting and not spaces a
On 11/30/2011 03:37 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>>
>>> This patch is an update of http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/1452/
>
> Hi,
>
> the patch is essentially fine, however there are whitespace errors.
>
> can you please use tabs for indenting and not spaces and then resend the
> patch so i can me
On 29/11/11 08:01, Marek Lindner wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
>> This patch is an update of http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/1452/
>>
>> The update makes sure that the kernel config actually enables gpio sysfs,
>> not just provides support for it. So, as well as the patch, it includes a
>> diff on the de
Hey,
> This patch is an update of http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/1452/
>
> The update makes sure that the kernel config actually enables gpio sysfs,
> not just provides support for it. So, as well as the patch, it includes a
> diff on the default config for atheros. The patch itself is un
This patch is an update of http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/1452/
The update makes sure that the kernel config actually _enables_ gpio sysfs, not
just provides support
for it. So, as well as the patch, it includes a diff on the default config for
atheros. The patch
itself is unchanged, and
