On 2020-01-29 17:22, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Rosen Penev [2020-01-25 15:04:03]:
>
> Hi Bjørn and Rosen,
>
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:25 AM Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> > >
>> > > - if ((rt_sysc_r32(SYSC_REG_CHIP_REV_ID) & 0x) == 0x0101) {
>> > > - /* (GE1, Force 1000M/FD, FC ON, MA
Bjørn Mork [2020-01-30 10:54:17]:
> Are you sure the revision says anything about which SoC this is?
Nope :-) It's based only on source code observation.
-- ynezz
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.
Rosen Penev [2020-01-29 20:39:57]:
Hi,
> On kernel.org, the ralink_soc variable is only used in arch/mips ,
> mainly under the ralink subdirectory.
correct, but your proposed patch can't be accepted as it is. You need to
handle only 0x0101 and 0x0103 cases, thus putting content of the register
Rosen Penev writes:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 3:14 PM Rosen Penev wrote:
>> > On Jan 29, 2020, at 8:22 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
>> >
>> > I just quickly skimmed through the code and it seems like we've that
>> > information already in dmesg:
>> >
>> > SoC Type: MediaTek MT7688 ver:1 eco:2= 0x
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 3:14 PM Rosen Penev wrote:
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jan 29, 2020, at 8:22 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> >
> > Rosen Penev [2020-01-25 15:04:03]:
> >
> > Hi Bjørn and Rosen,
> >
> >>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:25 AM Bjørn Mork wrote:
> >
> > - if ((r
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 29, 2020, at 8:22 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
>
> Rosen Penev [2020-01-25 15:04:03]:
>
> Hi Bjørn and Rosen,
>
>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:25 AM Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
> - if ((rt_sysc_r32(SYSC_REG_CHIP_REV_ID) & 0x) == 0x0101) {
> -
Rosen Penev [2020-01-25 15:04:03]:
Hi Bjørn and Rosen,
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:25 AM Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > >
> > > - if ((rt_sysc_r32(SYSC_REG_CHIP_REV_ID) & 0x) == 0x0101) {
> > > - /* (GE1, Force 1000M/FD, FC ON, MAX_RX_LENGTH 1536) */
> > > + if ((rt_sysc_r32(SYS
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:25 AM Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
> Rosen Penev writes:
>
> > Several users have been reporting crashing issues with the ethernet
> > driver.
> >
> > One source says that this is a silicon bug in mt7621:
> > https://github.com/openwrt/mt76/issues/211#issuecomment-569687506
> >
Rosen Penev writes:
> Several users have been reporting crashing issues with the ethernet
> driver.
>
> One source says that this is a silicon bug in mt7621:
> https://github.com/openwrt/mt76/issues/211#issuecomment-569687506
>
> A user that has been testing this has seen greater than 2-3 days up
Several users have been reporting crashing issues with the ethernet
driver.
One source says that this is a silicon bug in mt7621:
https://github.com/openwrt/mt76/issues/211#issuecomment-569687506
A user that has been testing this has seen greater than 2-3 days uptime
of the ethernet interface wit
10 matches
Mail list logo
