On 26.02.20 17:17, Tim Harvey wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 5:27 AM John Crispin wrote:
On 25.02.20 22:58, Tim Harvey wrote:
Hi Tim,
thanks for the patch, we are in the process of bumping to v5.4. Would
you have time to also try bumping octeontx to v5.4 ? staging tree is
located here ->
http
Hi Tim,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On
> Behalf Of Tim Harvey
> Sent: Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2020 17:18
> To: John Crispin
> Cc: OpenWrt Development List
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] octeontx
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 5:27 AM John Crispin wrote:
>
> On 25.02.20 22:58, Tim Harvey wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
> thanks for the patch, we are in the process of bumping to v5.4. Would
> you have time to also try bumping octeontx to v5.4 ? staging tree is
> located here ->
> https://git.openwrt.org/?p=ope
On 25.02.20 22:58, Tim Harvey wrote:
Hi Tim,
thanks for the patch, we are in the process of bumping to v5.4. Would
you have time to also try bumping octeontx to v5.4 ? staging tree is
located here ->
https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/xback.git;a=summary and we
plan to merge it to mas
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey
---
target/linux/octeontx/Makefile | 2 +-
target/linux/octeontx/config-4.19 | 573 +
...nderx-use-proper-interface-type-for-RGMII.patch | 47 ++
...hunderx-workaround-BGX-TX-Underflow-issue.patch | 150 ++
