John Crispin wrote:
> thanks, applied, [11432]
Hm, the change is not correct. The line should be modified. The change
adds a new one instead. I just applied this patch today without
problems. Might the "-" got lost, when you copied it?
> Fabian Hugelshofer wrote:
>> (Oops, previous patches had
thanks, applied, [11432]
Fabian Hugelshofer wrote:
> (Oops, previous patches had missing path. Still needs to be applied...)
>
> In libnfnetlink 0.0.38 a new header file (linux_libnfnetlink_compat.h)
> was introduced, which needs to be copied to the staging dir as well.
> Right now build fails
(Oops, previous patches had missing path. Still needs to be applied...)
In libnfnetlink 0.0.38 a new header file (linux_libnfnetlink_compat.h)
was introduced, which needs to be copied to the staging dir as well.
Right now build fails for applications using libnfnetlink.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Huge
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 09:40 +0100, Fabian Hugelshofer wrote:
> In libnfnetlink 0.0.38 a new header file (linux_libnfnetlink_compat.h)
> was introduced, which needs to be copied to the staging dir as well.
> Right now build fails for applications using libnfnetlink.
This patch has still not been in
In libnfnetlink 0.0.38 a new header file (linux_libnfnetlink_compat.h)
was introduced, which needs to be copied to the staging dir as well.
Right now build fails for applications using libnfnetlink.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Hugelshofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: Makefile
