On 07/16/2013 08:48 PM, Julián Landerreche wrote:
> Thinking a little more about this, I'd dare to say: the dhcp_domain_add
> function might be ditched without remorse. After r36943 changeset, it seems
> it's not currently used any more. Also, after reading & re-reading the
> dnsmasq man page a
Thinking a little more about this, I'd dare to say: the dhcp_domain_add
function might be ditched without remorse. After r36943 changeset, it seems
it's not currently used any more. Also, after reading & re-reading the
dnsmasq man page a few times, I'd dare to say that it doesn't make too much
sens
Hi Adam, thanks for the prompt reply.
This functionality already (mostly) exists. My patch, which switched
> something to use host-record instead, did not remove the existing
> functionality. (...)
Now I notice that I linked to your patch in my email, but forgot to mention
the relation between y
Hi Julián,
This functionality already (mostly) exists. My patch, which switched something
to use host-record instead, did not remove the existing functionality.
Specifically there's this configuration structure:
config 'domain'
option 'name' 'typhoon'
option 'ip' '192.168.1.14
The goal of this change is to allow the dynamic creation
of an "--address" option for each host in the local network.
This opens up the possibility of fitting a common request among users
(particularly web-developers). That request is:to resolve DNS
request for wildcard subdomains for local domain
