On Monday 17 September 2012 19:45:15 Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 06:36:11PM -0300, Jonh Wendell wrote:
> > Hi. Just curious, did you submit this patch to busybox guys?
> Applied in busybox' master in slightly modified form.
Applied in r33475, thanks Alexey!
--
Florian
__
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 06:36:11PM -0300, Jonh Wendell wrote:
> Hi. Just curious, did you submit this patch to busybox guys?
Applied in busybox' master in slightly modified form.
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 06:36:11PM -0300, Jonh Wendell wrote:
> Hi. Just curious, did you submit this patch to busybox guys?
No, mostly because it's 01:38 am here and I'm not sure about
current status of busybox upstream, you know, internet is full of
rumors about forks an lawsuits ;-)
I've seen t
Hi. Just curious, did you submit this patch to busybox guys?
Em 06/09/2012 18:29, "Alexey I. Froloff" escreveu:
> When running as KVM or Xen guest, packets may be received with
> incomplete checksum[1]. Patch adopted from Fedora dhcp package.
>
> [1]. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/
When running as KVM or Xen guest, packets may be received with
incomplete checksum[1]. Patch adopted from Fedora dhcp package.
[1]. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1003853
Signed-off-by: Alexey I. Froloff
---
package/busybox/patches/950-partial-checksum.patch | 87 +++
