Hi Alexey,
On 19/10/12 16:59, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
>> Replaced 950-partial-checksum.patch with upstream commit
>> 3c62bbae94642e6d05bc9f900bbdb5173d26cc51.
> Do I need to do something about that?
Nope. The previous version o
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> Replaced 950-partial-checksum.patch with upstream commit
> 3c62bbae94642e6d05bc9f900bbdb5173d26cc51.
Do I need to do something about that?
There was discussion in busybox ML and this is the final form of
this patch, so I totally
Hello Jonathan, Oliver,
On Monday 30 July 2012 04:38:54 Oliver wrote:
> On Saturday 28 July 2012 15:30:37 Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> > Based on Peter Wagner's busybox 1.20.0 patch.
>
> Curses, beaten to the punch!
>
> I've attached my patch anyway since I poured through the config options to
>
On Saturday 28 July 2012 15:30:37 Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> Based on Peter Wagner's busybox 1.20.0 patch.
Curses, beaten to the punch!
I've attached my patch anyway since I poured through the config options to keep
them as OpenWRT friendly (and compatible) as possible in terms of default
value
