2012/1/4 Markus Stockhausen :
> Hello,
>
> attached an extension to the already existing patch that will fix some more
> unaligned
> accesses on ar71xx devices. First patch location during establishing of tcp
> recv operations.
> The second one is only relevant for IPsec tunnels. In my setup this r
Awesome. Did you get any different performance numbers from something
like iperf or netperf from this?
Sorry but the patch is only a residue from my work on a fast IPsec module.
It might help when doing normal transfers over gigabit interconnect. Here
a snippet with the patch applied for an IPs
2012/1/4 Markus Stockhausen :
> Hello,
>
> attached an extension to the already existing patch that will fix some more
> unaligned
> accesses on ar71xx devices. First patch location during establishing of tcp
> recv operations.
Awesome. Did you get any different performance numbers from something
On a side note would the unaligned patch in the ar71xx target benefit
the atheros target?
On 01/04/2012 10:58 AM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Hello,
attached an extension to the already existing patch that will fix some
more unaligned
accesses on ar71xx devices. First patch location during estab
Hello,
attached an extension to the already existing patch that will fix some more
unaligned
accesses on ar71xx devices. First patch location during establishing of tcp
recv operations.
The second one is only relevant for IPsec tunnels. In my setup this results in
the following
numbers:
- Wit
