Had some minutes before I leave, attached is the 089 rebasement patch.
Maddes
On 13.11.2010 09:19, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote:
> I think generic patch 089 must be rebased when 014 is removed.
>
> Maddes
>
> On 12.11.2010 18:14, Guillaume LECERF wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Guillaume LECERF
>
I think generic patch 089 must be rebased when 014 is removed.
Maddes
On 12.11.2010 18:14, Guillaume LECERF wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume LECERF
> ---
> .../014-cfi_show_amd_extended_table_version.patch | 30
>
> .../014-cfi_show_amd_extended_table_version.patch |
On 12.11.2010 21:33, Guillaume LECERF wrote:
> 2010/11/12 Matthias Buecher / Germany :
>> Generic 014 is also something I'm currently working on, and it is not
>> really obsolete.
>> The printk() definitely helps to identify hardware, especially not
>> supported one.
>> The other changes help devel
2010/11/12 Matthias Buecher / Germany :
> Generic 014 is also something I'm currently working on, and it is not
> really obsolete.
> The printk() definitely helps to identify hardware, especially not
> supported one.
> The other changes help developers to find the correct spots for
> enhancements.
Generic 014 is also something I'm currently working on, and it is not
really obsolete.
The printk() definitely helps to identify hardware, especially not
supported one.
The other changes help developers to find the correct spots for
enhancements.
You may remove the blocks with the comments, but th
Signed-off-by: Guillaume LECERF
---
.../014-cfi_show_amd_extended_table_version.patch | 30
.../014-cfi_show_amd_extended_table_version.patch | 30
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
target/linux/generic/patches-2
