I am still facing same issue whenever compiling latest trunk with D7800 is
selected. When this issue will be fixed?
Regards,
Tathagata
-Original Message-
From: Tathagata Das [mailto:tathag...@alumnux.com]
Sent: 28 January 2016 15:51
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: RE
I have further debugged it and noticed that if CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ath10k is
selected then only I am getting this error.
Also selecting D7800 doesn't select wireless drivers automatically.
Regards,
Tathagata
-Original Message-
From: Tathagata Das [mailto:tathag...@alumnux.com]
Sen
Hello,
I am getting build error while compiling latest OpenWRT trunk for IPQ806x.
Below is the error message.
Inconsistent kallsyms data
Try make KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS=1 as a workaround
make[4]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
Regards,
Tathagata
---
Alumnus Software Ltd
Infinity
Hi John,
Thank you for your help.
Please let me know your changes so that next time I can do that myself.
Regards,
Tathagata
-Original Message-
From: John Crispin [mailto:blo...@openwrt.org]
Sent: 19 January 2016 14:31
To: Tathagata Das; openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re
Done -- just prepared and sent it again.
Regards,
Tathagata
-Original Message-
From: John Crispin [mailto:blo...@openwrt.org]
Sent: 19 January 2016 14:13
To: Tathagata Das; openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add support for Netgear D7800
please do
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
---
.../linux/ipq806x/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds | 1 +
.../ipq806x/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 1 +
target/linux/ipq806x/base-files/lib/ipq806x.sh | 3 +
.../ipq806x/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh | 2 +
target/linux/ipq806x
Do you mean to say that I have to prepare the patch against latest code of
trunk and send that it again?
Regards,
Tathagata
-Original Message-
From: John Crispin [mailto:blo...@openwrt.org]
Sent: 19 January 2016 14:07
To: Tathagata Das; openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re
Hi John,
I sent the patch last time using git command and I even received an email
from OpenWRT on 12th January 2016.
Regards,
Tathagata
-Original Message-
From: John Crispin [mailto:blo...@openwrt.org]
Sent: 19 January 2016 13:45
To: Tathagata Das; openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Any update about the patch?
Regards,
Tathagata
-Original Message-
From: Tathagata Das [mailto:tathag...@alumnux.com]
Sent: 12 January 2016 20:47
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Cc: Tathagata Das
Subject: [PATCH] Add support for Netgear D7800
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
---
.../linux/ipq806x/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds | 1 +
.../ipq806x/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 1 +
target/linux/ipq806x/base-files/lib/ipq806x.sh | 3 +
.../ipq806x/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh | 2 +
target/linux/ipq806x
5-12-25 12:46, Tathagata Das wrote:
>
>> Add support for the Netgear D7800 and build appropriate sysupgrade and
>> factory images.
>>
>> Known issues:
>> . USB ports are not working
>> . DSL is not added
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
,
Tathagata
On 25-12-2015 21:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 12/25/2015 12:46 PM, Tathagata Das wrote:
>
>> Add support for the Netgear D7800 and build appropriate sysupgrade and
>> factory images.
>>
>> Known issues:
>> . USB ports are not working
>&
Add support for the Netgear D7800 and build appropriate sysupgrade and
factory images.
Known issues:
. USB ports are not working
. DSL is not added
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
---
.../linux/ipq806x/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds | 1 +
.../ipq806x/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
Hi John,
I don't why it did't reach. I sent it using git command and I got a copy
that of email. I also kept you in cc list.
Regards,
Tatha
On 25-12-2015 13:19, John Crispin wrote:
> On 24/12/2015 17:55, Tathagata Das wrote:
>
>> Thank you for help John.
>&g
; then call this command to send the patch
>
> git send-email --to openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org 0001-my_fix.patch
>
> John
>
> On 24/12/2015 14:31, Tathagata Das wrote:
>
> I have tried with git -send-email option. But it says command not
> supported. Could you send
Add support for the Netgear D7800 and build appropriate sysupgrade and
factory images.
Known issues:
. USB ports are not working
. DSL is not added
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
From 41487fc5f03abbd24c1a979c1c0e59a5f7da2898 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tathagata Das
Date: Thu, 24
t;;
++
++ usb1 {
++ label = "d7800:amber:usb1";
++ gpios = <&qcom_pinmux 7 0>;
++ };
++
++ usb3 {
++ label = "d7800:amber:usb3";
++ gpios = <&
Thanks John.
Please let me know once it is merged into trunk.
Regards,
Tathagata
On 2015-12-17 16:10, John Crispin wrote:
On 17/12/2015 10:51, Tathagata Das wrote:
I am not sure if this patch is under verification or not. Please let
me know
if any modification is required in this patch
I am not sure if this patch is under verification or not. Please let me know
if any modification is required in this patch.
Regards,
Tathagata
-Original Message-
From: Tathagata Das [mailto:tathag...@alumnux.com]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 3:07 PM
To: 'OpenWrt Development
Add support for the Netgear D7800 and build appropariate sysupgrade and
factory images.
Known issues:
. USB ports are not working
. DSL is not added
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
d7800_support.patch
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing
Hi,
First of all thanks all who designed netifd and ubus.
I would like to use netifd in my OpenWRT based router. So I am looking into the
source code of netifd and ubus. But I didn't find much information about ubus.
Is there any documents on how they interact ?
I heard that Luci uses netifd fo
Hi,
I have modified the patch. This patch will only copy a single file from local
repository. If more than one instance of the same file exists in the subfolders
then it will throw an error.
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
---
diff -Naur a/scripts/download.pl b/scripts/download.pl
--- a
build and Linux build
in separate directories.
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
---
diff -Naur a/include/kernel.mk b/include/kernel.mk
--- a/include/kernel.mk 2012-04-05 13:10:50.0 +0530
+++ b/include/kernel.mk 2012-04-06 16:09:18.0 +0530
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
PATCH_DIR
Hi,
I have updated the patch as Philip and Jo-Philipp suggested.
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
---
diff -Naur a/scripts/download.pl b/scripts/download.pl
--- a/scripts/download.pl 2012-04-05 18:59:13.0 +0530
+++ b/scripts/download.pl 2012-04-06 11:27:12.0 +0530
Hi,
I have updated the patch as Philip and Jo-Philipp suggested.
Thanks Philip and Jo-Philipp for your feedback.
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
---
diff -Naur a/scripts/download.pl b/scripts/download.pl
--- a/scripts/download.pl 2012-04-04 13:19:27.0 +0530
+++ b/scripts
feedback.
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
---
diff -Naur a/scripts/download.pl b/scripts/download.pl
--- a/scripts/download.pl 2012-03-05 10:44:02.0 +0530
+++ b/scripts/download.pl 2012-04-02 17:31:28.0 +0530
@@ -74,7 +74,18 @@
if(! -d $target
t path.
I have used latest trunk code (revision number 31050) to create this patch.
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
---
diff -Naur a/include/package-dumpinfo.mk b/include/package-dumpinfo.mk
--- a/include/package-dumpinfo.mk 2012-03-20 13:12:11.0 +0530
+++ b/include/package-dumpinfo.mk
Hi,
Please let me know your feedback on the submitted patch.
Regards,
Tatha
-Original Message-
From: Tathagata Das [mailto:tathag...@alumnux.com]
Sent: 22 March 2012 17:53
To: 'OpenWrt Development List'
Subject: [PATCH] Patch to use local repository and follow symbolic
Hi,
May I know whether this patch will be accepted or not ?
Regards,
Tatha
-Original Message-
From: Tathagata Das [mailto:tathag...@alumnux.com]
Sent: 26 March 2012 12:02
To: 'OpenWrt Development List'
Subject: [Patch] Resubmitting of patch to use external sources of rootfs
Hi,
This changes allow developers to use external (mentioned) sources of rootfs. I
have used latest trunk source code (revision number 31050) to create this patch.
If the patch submission format is okay then I will resubmit my other patches.
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das
---
diff -Naur a
Hi Hauke,
Sorry, I do not understand. Could you please clarify ?
Regards,
Tatha
On 23.03.2012 16:53, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 03/23/2012 12:48 PM, Tathagata Das wrote:
Hi,
Attached file adds uClibc configuration specification for external
toolchain. Instead of having to configure
Hi,
Attach patch unsets LPATH flag (found configured in some custom host
distributions) to make OpenWRT compile its toolchain without any issues. I have
used latest trunk source code (revision number 31050) to create this patch.
Regards,
Tathagata
env-fix-unset-lpath
Description: Binary
latest trunk source code
(revision number 31050) to create this patch.
Regards,
Tathagata
add-external-uClibc-support
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo
create this
patch.
Regards,
Tathagata
localmirrors-default-support.patch
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
Attached is OpenWRT general purpose patch. Through this patch, OpenWRT
developers may use external (mentioned) sources of rootfs. I have used latest
trunk source code (revision number 31050) to create this patch.
Regards,
Tathagata
external-cpio-support.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi Hauke,
Thanks for adding that patch. I tested it and it worked on my device.
Regards,
Tatha
-Original Message-
From: Hauke Mehrtens [mailto:ha...@hauke-m.de]
Sent: 15 March 2012 05:02
To: Tathagata Das
Cc: 'OpenWrt Development List'; 'Florian Fainelli'
Subject:
.
Regards,
Tatha
-Original Message-
From: Hauke Mehrtens [mailto:ha...@hauke-m.de]
Sent: 01 March 2012 04:39
To: Tathagata Das
Cc: 'OpenWrt Development List'; 'Florian Fainelli'
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updated kernel patch in trunk to support brcm47xx BCMA
NAND flash
On
Hi,
Attached is the updated kernel patch to support brcm47xx BCMA NAND flash. It
contains fix of issue in write small length.
I have used latest trunk source code to create this patch. I have tested it on
Netgear WNR3500Lv2.
Thanks all who gave comments.
Regards,
Tathagata
9991-bcm47xx
Hi Florian,
Please find my inline comments.
Regards,
Tatha
-Original Message-
From: Florian Fainelli [mailto:f.faine...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Florian
Fainelli
Sent: 28 February 2012 14:54
To: Tathagata Das
Cc: 'OpenWrt Development List'; 'Hauke Mehrtens'
Subject:
Hi Florian,
Thank you for your comment. I will integrate them and also fix the
issue in write.
Tomorrow I will upload the updated patch. Hope it will be then merged
into OpenWRT.
Regards,
Tatha
On 28.02.2012 14:24, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hello Tatha,
Le 02/28/12 07:50, Tathagata Das a
I have found one issue in write function.
If the length of writing data is smaller than pagesize then it fails to write.
I am now solving this issue.
Regards,
Tathagata
-Original Message-
From: Tathagata Das [mailto:tathag...@alumnux.com]
Sent: 28 February 2012 12:20
To: 'Op
Hi,
Attached is the updated kernel patch to support brcm47xx BCMA NAND flash.
I have used latest trunk source code to create this patch. I have tested it on
Netgear WNR3500Lv2.
Thanks to Florian and Hauke for their comments.
Regards,
Tathagata
9991-bcm47xx-bcma-nandflash.patch
Description
?
Once these above cases resolve I will provide you the updated patch.
Regards,
Tatha
-Original Message-
From: Hauke Mehrtens [mailto:ha...@hauke-m.de]
Sent: 25 February 2012 19:08
To: Tathagata Das
Cc: 'OpenWrt Development List'; 'Florian Fainelli'
Subject: Re: [PATCH]
Hi,
Attached is the updated kernel patch to support brcm47xx BCMA NAND flash. I
have used latest trunk source code to create this patch.
Thanks to Florian and Hauke for their comments.
Regards,
Tathagata
9991-bcm47xx-bcma-nandflash.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi Hauke,
Yes, I am still working on that patch. I am now integrating Florian
comments. Also I found couple of issues in write and erase functions. I have
solved them too.
I will submit my patch quickly.
Regards,
Tathagata
-Original Message-
From: Hauke Mehrtens [mailto:ha...@hauke-m.de
Hi Florian,
Thanks a lot for your comment. I will update the patch accordingly.
Regards,
Tathagata
On 01/12/2012 06:40 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hello Tathagata,
On 01/10/12 13:00, Tathagata Das wrote:
Hi,
Attached is the updated kernel patch to support brcm47xx BCMA NAND
flash. This
Hi Hauke,
I guess some NAND flash specific code are not under NAND flash tag.
Regards,
Tatha
On 01/12/2012 04:51 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 01/12/2012 04:13 AM, tathagata wrote:
Hi Hauke,
I will modify it and send updated patch.
Which hardware are you using ?
Regards,
Tathagata
Hi
Hi Hauke,
I will modify it and send updated patch.
Which hardware are you using ?
Regards,
Tathagata
On 12.01.2012 03:41, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 01/10/2012 01:00 PM, Tathagata Das wrote:
Hi,
Attached is the updated kernel patch to support brcm47xx BCMA NAND
flash. This patch uses driver
Hi Hauke,
I built from scratch with your patch. I hope your changes were applied
because I used revision 29611.
I did not see any of those message as you mentioned.
If I am able to fix this issue I will send you the patch for new device.
Regards,
Tathagata
On 01/04/2012 12:38 AM, Hauke
Hi Hauke,
USB is still not working. I have used trunk with version number 29611.
Did you test USB ?
Regards,
Tathagata
On 12/24/2011 03:31 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Hi Tathagata,
I found an error in my initialization code for usb cores with rev>= 5
like yours. Could you please try a vers
descriptor/start: -71
[ 410.588000] usb 1-1: chopping to 0 config(s)
[ 410.604000] usb 1-1: string descriptor 0 read error: -71
[ 410.608000] usb 1-1: no configuration chosen from 0 choices
However with my USB patch I can mount the same USB drive.
Regards,
Tathagata
On 12/23/2011 02:26 AM, Hauke
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback.
I will modify the patch. Also I am trying to use
driver/mtd/nand/nand_base.c as much as possible. I will submit modify
patch quickly.
Regards,
Tathagata
On 12/23/2011 03:28 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 12/14/2011 05:51 AM, Tathagata Das wrote:
Hi,
Attached
Hi,
Attached is the kernel patch to support brcm47xx BCMA USB (both OHCI and
EHCI).
I have used latest trunk source code to create this patch.
Regards,
Tathagata
diff -Naur a/drivers/bcma/Kconfig b/drivers/bcma/Kconfig
--- a/drivers/bcma/Kconfig 2011-12-12 13:06:36.728423218 +0530
+++ b
Hi,
Attached is the updated kernel patch to support brcm47xx BCMA NAND
flash. I have removed SSB related code from this patch and I have used
latest trunk source code to create this patch.
Regards,
Tathagata
diff -Naur a/arch/mips/bcm47xx/bus.c b/arch/mips/bcm47xx/bus.c
--- a/arch/mips
.
Could you please tell me the exact name of the patch ?
I will also submit bootlog, vendor firmware and OpenWRT firmware along
with my modified patch.
Regards,
Tathagata
On 12/11/2011 10:56 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Hi Tathagata,
in general this patch looks good and it could be accepted. I will
.
Can this patch be accepted ?
Regards,
Tathagata
On 11.12.2011 05:48, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 12/09/2011 08:16 AM, Tathagata Das wrote:
Hi,
Attached is the kernel patch to support brcm47xx NAND flash.
I have used latest trunk source code to create this patch.
Regards,
Tathagata
Hi
Hi,
I am still waiting for the response. Is that serial flash patch
accepted or there are some issues to be solved ?
Regards,
Tathagata
Tathagata Das wrote:
Hi,
Is that patch accepted or do I need to modify something ?
Regards,
Tathagata
Tathagata Das wrote:
Hi,
Attached patch is for
Hi,
Is that patch accepted or do I need to modify something ?
Regards,
Tathagata
Tathagata Das wrote:
Hi,
Attached patch is for supporting serial flash of Netgear WNR3500L.
Regards,
Tathagata
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel
I have already submitted one separate patch for sflash.
Below is the link of the same.
http://www.mail-archive.com/openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org/msg05976.html
Regards,
Tathagata
Per Åstrand wrote:
On 2010-05-26 12:10 AM, Per ?strand wrote:
Hi!
I've updated the patch for wnr350
Hi,
Attached patch is for supporting serial flash of Netgear WNR3500L.
Regards,
Tathagata
diff -Naur a/arch/mips/Kconfig b/arch/mips/Kconfig
--- a/arch/mips/Kconfig 2010-05-13 18:22:35.0 +0530
+++ b/arch/mips/Kconfig 2010-05-13 18:19:37.0 +0530
@@ -9,6 +9,10 @@
select
Fine, I will clean up this serial flash driver as much as possible and
submit it again.
Regards,
Tathagata
Bernhard Loos wrote:
Your patch contains a driver for the serial flash chip on the
wnr3500l, but it's kinda ugly (excessive ioremaps, duplicated defines,
global statics, ...).
I
What do you mean to say "clean up the flash driver you have" ?
Regards,
Tathagata
Bernhard Loos wrote:
2010/5/17 Tathagata Das :
Okay, so I will start working on those drivers (serial and wired). Does
current version of OpenWRT trunk supports WNR3500L ? Otherwise I need to
downl
me to
proceed faster.
Regards,
Tathagata
Bernhard Loos wrote:
2010/5/17 Tathagata Das :
Hi,
I have used source code of version 21251. It might be possible that some
fixes has been made after that version which is not reflected in my code. So
if I use latest code then that issue will be
Hi,
I have not done anything specific to 3300.
Regards,
Tathagata
Weedy wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Tathagata Das wrote:
Hi,
Attached is the kernel patch to support Netgear WNR3500L. All changes are
made under CONFIG_WNR3500L.
I have used trunk source code of version number
Hi,
Attached is the kernel patch to support Netgear WNR3500L. All changes
are made under CONFIG_WNR3500L.
I have used trunk source code of version number 21251 to create this
kernel patch.
Regards,
Tathagata
diff -Naur a/arch/mips/bcm47xx/irq.c b/arch/mips/bcm47xx/irq.c
--- a/arch/mips
ght in one file only, sflash.c. Please let me
know what would be the Copyright content. I will put that into that file.
Thank you for showing interest in my kernel patch. I would definitely
try to find out the corresponding wired driver.
Thanks & Regards,
Tathagata
Bernhard Loos wrote:
I am still waiting any response. Any help regarding this is appreciated.
Tathagata
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Tathagata Das wrote:
> Hi All,
> I want to port WNR3500L onto Kamikaze-8.09.1 with kernel-2.6.25 which has
> ssb driver. But in WNR3500L, ssb has been changes. So to port
want to check that is there anybody
who is already working on it ? If no work has been done then could somebody
please tell what should be the approach of porting this ?
Thanks in advance.
Tathagata
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel
68 matches
Mail list logo
