I'm trying to distribute an SDK and an ImageBuilder from an OpenWrt
build, so that another team can compile their code (in a different
repo), link against target libraries (e.g. openssl, etc.), and then
create an image including their packages on top of the stock packages.
Way back (a few years ag
rtens wrote:
> On 11/22/2017 07:14 PM, Shankar Unni wrote:
> > Just enquiring about the status of Linux 4.14 support for LEDE/OpenWrt,
> > now that it's been released and gone into the LTS phase (i.e. is it
> > being worked on by anyone currently?).
> >
> > Mu
Just enquiring about the status of Linux 4.14 support for LEDE/OpenWrt, now
that it's been released and gone into the LTS phase (i.e. is it being
worked on by anyone currently?).
Much thanks in advance,
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.
IIRC, your patch did not specify different -x options to each instance
to ensure that the PID files were written to separate files. That's at
least one issue that occasionally caused races at startup.
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Daniel Dickinson
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had a patch that I sub
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Sebastian Careba wrote:
> This uses the current Git prerelease, as the latest stable (1.1.0)
> doesn't build cleanly.
>
> The default configuration makes a few changes for OpenWrt:
> - access log is disabled by default; too verbose for the circular
> syslog b
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Karl Vogel wrote:
>
> Doesn't look like the SVN server is back yet either.
>
> Are there any plans to resurrect the anon SVN server? Or should everybody
> move to git.openwrt.org instead?
>
Yeah, I've been waiting for this, too (svn.openwrt.org).
It would be good
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:33 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> the following SVN server will be online for the next 4-6 weeks. please
> start migrating away from SVN now. we will give 1 week prior notice
> before finally turning it of.
>
> --> svn://svn.mein.io/openwrt
Thank you so much. We'll get on it
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Shankar Unni
wrote:
> By the way, is there any update on the status of svn.openwrt.org
> (78.24.191.177)? I still can't reach it via svn (svn update says
> "Connection refused").
Apologies for the top-post -
By the way, is there any update on the status of svn.openwrt.org
(78.24.191.177)? I still can't reach it via svn (svn update says
"Connection refused").
I'd love to switch to git.openwrt.org as soon as I can, but it's a
little difficult for me to switch on the fly and recreate everything.
It woul
>From another message from Rafael, it looks like the openwrt server
infra is having some issues with disks, and he says to expect "some
down time". Some things seem to be available, but others (like the
svn server) seem to be down.
(Right now, I can access the main website, and the download site,
at 1:35 PM, Tobias Welz wrote:
> Yes, git is up.
>
> @Shankar: give git a try - a much better than svn
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] svn.openwrt.org down?
> From: Etienne Champetier
> To: Shankar Unni
> Cc: OpenWrt Development Lis
The svn server on svn.openwrt.org seems to be down? The machine itself
is up and running, however.
Is there a known outage?
% svn up
svn: Can't connect to host 'svn.openwrt.org': Connection refused
% ping svn.openwrt.org
PING svn.openwrt.org (78.24.191.177) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from o
e did some recent work on
> Archer c7v2. & DB-120(WDR4300)
>
> -Irfan
> Paxym Inc.
> www.paxym.com <http://www.paxym.com/>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Shankar Unni <mailto:shankaru...@netscape.net>> wrote:
> We have an openwrt build that
We have an openwrt build that we're working with, that has the most recent
compat-wireless from the trunk (package/kernel/mac80211).
When we load the ath10k driver, it seems to pause for several seconds and write
out a message about not finding a particular firmware file:
[6.418730] ath10k_
You even make the conflicts "reliably handled" by processing the contents of,
say, /etc/config/wireless.d/* in sort order (the old "01-blah", "02-foo"
trick). This way, if one package drops in a config file that you want to
override, you only have to make sure that your override comes "after" t
Has anyone created a package for DPDK (http://dpdk.org/) on any recent Openwrt
version (or master)? I've been googling like crazy, but I don't find any
discussion about DPDK on openwrt anywhere.
If not, I'll try to create something myself.
Thanks,
--
Shankar Unni
shankaru.
voked only after a
successful negotiation and link sense. :-/.
-Original Message-----
From: Aaron Z
To: Shankar Unni
Cc: OpenWrt Development List
Sent: Tue, Nov 11, 2014 8:21 pm
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Configuring ethernet auto-negotiation off, setting
speeds explicitly
On Tue, Nov 11,
t can allow us to do this?
I'm guessing this will come down to writing some hotplug scripts to read extra
configs from /etc/config/network and invoke ethtool manually..
Thanks in advance!
--
Shankar Unni.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt
Working with trunk SVN version 41290.
I'm trying to tweak our setup to pass additional parameters on the command line
to hostapd, and I was hoping to configure that using /etc/config/wireless, in
the config wifi-device section.
So I added
option addl_param 'pval'
to the wifi-device config
Thanks for the pointers, all!
Let me try with this approach. I'll probably have to build a wrapper around
it, since it's being probed from within a C user-space program.
On Jun 16, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the data is cached upon the first call.
>
> To force a res
Ping?
How can I look up the current state of the various wireless interfaces using
"uci" now?
Thanks in advance,
On Jun 10, 2014, at 5:09 PM, Shankar Unni wrote:
> I recently updated my tree to a very recent trunk SVN version (40995), and I
> noticed that my system no
I recently updated my tree to a very recent trunk SVN version (40995), and I
noticed that my system no longer seems to maintain a /var/state/wireless (UCI
state of the wireless interfaces - up/down, interface name, etc.). It used to
do so as recently as 38990 (which was the last version I was u
22 matches
Mail list logo
