Hi again,
On 02/04/2013 08:32 PM, Niels Boehm wrote:
>
> On 02/04/2013 08:13 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>> I wonder if it would make sense to set a lower priority by default (while
>> still keeping this option to allow overriding again).
>
> I'm not sure, I have
Hello,
On 02/04/2013 08:13 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> I wonder if it would make sense to set a lower priority by default (while
> still keeping this option to allow overriding again).
I'm not sure, I haven't really thought about that.
I guess one has to consider several points when making the
.
Setting the router's bridge on a lower numbered priority (and thus
higher in the selection hierarchy) solves the problem in the vast
majority of the cases by ensuring that the device that is most
likely powered on 24/7 gets chosen as root and prevents topology
changes.
Signed-off-by: Niels
