Hi Developers!
I'm happy to announce that the Flexibity Open Sensors Toolkit is on
Kickstarter now!
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/maximosipov/flexibity-internet-sensors
We are creating a completely open home wireless sensors platform,
based on Contiki OS sensors and OpenWRT routers. The ini
out
> life
> time?
>
> /me is looking forward to buy a couple of these new toys :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 12:47:21AM +0400, Maxim Osipov wrote:
>> Thanks Adam!
>> Do you have "Powered by Contiki OS" stickers? ;)
>> Max
>>
Thanks Adam!
Do you have "Powered by Contiki OS" stickers? ;)
Max
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Adam Dunkels wrote:
> Very cool!
>
> /adam
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote:
>>
>> Hello Developers,
>>
>> We would like to
Hello Developers,
We would like to announce the existence of Flexibity Open Sensors
Toolkit - an attempt to build an open, scalable platform for wireless
home monitoring. The idea is to give the world IPv6 connected sensors
with simple JSON interface, so that any web developer could integrate
it i
Hello,
I'm having a very strange problem with SLIP (tunslip6 from Contiki) on
OpenWRT (fon-ng) and hoping someone can help with investigation.
In short - wpan0 interface with address ::1/64 is created.
ping6 to ::1 is OK
ping6 to ::250:c2a8:c3d4:a645 FAILS. But tcpdump shows ICMP6
req
Hello,
The following patch fixes 6tunnel getopt processing on ARM. Currently
it just fails in default case and exits after reading all options.
Kind regards,
Maxim
Index: 6tunnel-0.11rc2/6tunnel.c
===
--- 6tunnel-0.11rc2.orig/6tunnel
Hello,
The following patcha fixes bluez-utils build (installation) failure:
Index: utils/bluez-utils/Makefile
===
--- utils/bluez-utils/Makefile (revision 29374)
+++ utils/bluez-utils/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@
>
> Could you please make a patch to reduce the number of options selected
> in at91/flexibity/config-2.6.39 and extend at91/config-default if necessary.
>
Hi Hauke,
I'm working to update Flexibity support in OpenWRT and will send an
updated patch soon.
Regards,
Maxim
___
Osipov
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:27:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Add flexibity version of v4l-utils
Signed-off-by: Maxim Osipov
---
v4l-utils/Makefile | 77 +++
v4l-utils/patches/001-libargp.patch | 48 ++
2 files changed, 125
Thank you, the patch will follow shortly.
Maxim
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:57 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> On 03/07/11 20:54, John Crispin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> applied in r27412
>>
>> i dropped the dhcp and system uci file. could you use uci-defaults
>> mechanism for those 2 and send a patch ?
>>
>> J
Thanks a lot! Feed is a good hint - I think I will go this way!
Maxim
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On Sunday 26 June 2011 23:50:09 Maxim Osipov wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Philip Prindeville
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On 6/26/1
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
> On 6/26/11 11:09 AM, Maxim Osipov wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Is there a method to ship customised for my subtarget configuration
>> files? For example, I need to do some modifications into lighttpd.conf
>>
Hi All,
Is there a method to ship customised for my subtarget configuration
files? For example, I need to do some modifications into lighttpd.conf
and modification of the lighttpd package doesn't sound like a good
solution. I could probably include all customized files into the
subtarget files or
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Maxim Osipov wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote:
>>
>> Please find updated Flexibity board support patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Osipov
>> ---
>
> If no comments - could someone commit
Hi!
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote:
>
> Please find updated Flexibity board support patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Osipov
> ---
> target/linux/at91/Makefile | 2 +-
> .../at91/flexibity/base-files/etc/config/dhcp
AFAIK it is synced with nbd git - by github team. It would be nice to
have there packages also.
Maxim
2011/5/7 Cyryl Płotnicki-Chudyk :
> Hello there
> I assume the main repo is the svn one ? If so then is the
> https://github.com/mirrors/openwrt somewhat oficially synced with the
> svn one ?
>
>
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> profiles are nothing more than package preselections.
>
> Anything that modifies the kernel / requires different compile options
> or flags has to be a subtarget.
>
Jow, thank you for clarification. Does this mean that the original
patch is
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Michael Heimpold wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 3. Mai 2011 09:48:20 schrieb Maxim Osipov:
>
>> > Please use a profile for this instead of a completely separate target. If
>> > your
>> > profile requires a different kernel configuration, th
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2011 21:54:49 Maxim Osipov wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> > On 04/27/2011 09:05 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Maxim
2011/5/2 Cezary Jackiewicz :
> Dnia 2011-05-02, o godz. 18:23:11
> Maxim Osipov napisał(a):
>
>> Any more comments? Any changes necessary to apply the patch?
>
> Why transmission config is in here?
This firmware will have a certain number of packages pre-installed and
with
Hi!
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> On 04/27/2011 09:05 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Maxim Osipov
>>> wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Maxim O
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 09:05 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Any comments for this patch? Is it possible to apply it?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Maxim
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:04 PM, M
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:04 AM, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto)
wrote:
>> So the question - does anyone work on it already? Any results?
>
> read from here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org/msg08779.html
>
Ok, thanks! So the answer is no :) I will port NetworkManager to
Ope
Hello All,
Our Flexibity project, based on OpenWRT (patch was just submitted),
will use a number of dynamic network connections, including 3G/4G
modems, WiFi and Ethernet (all USB based). In order to achieve this
and require minimal configuration from a user, we would like to
integrate NetworkMana
Hi All!
Any other comments? Is it a must to move to at91 or it can be standalone target?
Is something else necessary to get this patch committed?
Regards,
Maxim
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
>>
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:16:02 +0200, Maxim Osipov
> wrote:
>
>> target/linux/flexibity
>
> Why a new target? It seems to be an AT91 board. Integrate it there.
IMHO OpenWRT target is more like a platform rather then
Hello,
One more basic question - is there a "good" way to store default
configuration for my platform, similar to kernel defconfig?
Regards,
Maxim
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/
Hello,
I'm currently adding a new board support for OpenWRT and would like to
use 2.6.35 kernel with only my board patches. However build system
attempts to apply generic patches and fails:
if [ -s
"/home/maxim/Projects/flexibity/firmware/openwrt/build_dir/linux-flexibity/linux-2.6.35/patches/se
28 matches
Mail list logo
