Hello list,
I'm still struggling finding liblua in the build system by CMake.
This is a simple executable project and I have this at the top of the
CMakeLists.txt file:
cmake_minimum_required (VERSION 3.0)
project(hmd C)
SET(CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX /)
IF(NOT LUA_CFLAGS)
INCLUDE(FindPkgC
Hi,
I'm currently developing an application for OpenWRT. IT is written in C, and
uses the LUA libraries.
The C code is configured by CMake. The question is how can I detect, packages
with CMake.
At the host system, the application builds fine using CMake, and I have
something similar in my C
The order of the Ethernet ports were mixed up.
This commit fixes the order to be aligned with the physical layout.
Signed-off-by: Levente Kovacs
---
target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/base-
Please note that this link is broken:
https://lists.openwrt.org/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
Levente Kovacs
Senior Electronic Engineer
W: http://levente.logonex.eu
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/l
The order of the Ethernet ports were mixed up.
This commit fixes the order to be aligned with the physical layout.
Signed-off-by: Lev
---
target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc
Hi list,
Is this patch still needed for the latest musl?
901-crypt_size_hack.patch
Thanks,
Levente
--
Levente Kovacs
Senior Electronic Engineer
W: http://levente.logonex.eu
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lis
---
package/system/mtd/src/jffs2.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/package/system/mtd/src/jffs2.c b/package/system/mtd/src/jffs2.c
index b432f64ac0..5bf3eec328 100644
--- a/package/system/mtd/src/jffs2.c
+++ b/package/system/mtd/src/jffs2.c
@@ -308,6 +308,16 @@ int
On Thu, 17 May 2018 18:41:26 +0200
Koen Vandeputte wrote:
> -@@ -115,10 +115,14 @@ static inline void ath79_wdt_disable(void)
> +@@ -115,10 +115,14 @@ static inline void ath79_wdt_disable(voi
Is this really compiles?
--
Levente Kovacs
Senior Electronic Engineer
W: http://levente.logonex.eu
