On Saturday 22 February 2014 10:33:08 Michel Stempin wrote:
> Yes, but you should remove the definitions for all those GPIO pins, as they
> ar eno longer required.
Ok done.
> And I don't know if the "ath79_gpio_function_disable()" call is required or
> not, as this controls whether GPIO13-17 a
On Saturday 22 February 2014 10:11:08 Michel Stempin wrote:
> > You're right about using the word "guess". It IS guesswork when it comes
> > to these manufacturers. However, I will have to tentatively disagree it's
> > the same module. I have sort of identified 3 different modules:
> >
> > 1.
Hi Michel,
On Friday 21 February 2014 22:26:42 Michel Stempin wrote:
> Just one remark concerning your proposed patch: don't define every single
> GPIO as a LED, this is a terrible thing to do, as it prevents you from using
> a given GPIO as an input without recompiling the kernel.
I have att
If anybody are curious about this device, I have started writing a bit of
documentation on the wiki. Very brief at the moment, but I'll add more when I
got time:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/oolite/oolitev1
//Lars...
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
ope
Hi,
First of all my apologies if I don't follow the correct procedure to the
letter, but this is my first attempt at feeding changes into OpenWrt.
I have added support for the Oolite V1.0 AR9331 module.
I have attached a patch to the git head as of right now. If you prefer to pull
from git,
