ooks like that configuration
is stored in the subdirectory, and doing a make distclean is /probably/
blowing that configuration away. I don't find any busybox config items
in the main .config file at all.
Seems it's time for a smarter script. :)
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Pleas
process isn't
>> perfect yet.
>
> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2013-
November/022653.html
Handy, thanks! Somehow I missed this post.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
sn't matter which graph I try to
>> view):
>>
>> This page contains the following errors:
>> error on line 181 at column 136: EntityRef: expecting ';'
>> Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error.
>
> Fixed with htt
contains the following errors:
error on line 181 at column 136: EntityRef: expecting ';'
Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error.
I did preserve the previous configuration, if that makes a difference on
the wifi issues.
Thanks for any info about these issues and if they
On Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:32:03 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
> It seems the PREFIX/INSTALL_BASE message on the third line above is
> what's causing my issue. Looking at the makefiles, though, I can't see
> where it's picking up either value from.
>
> Can someone poin
PREFIX/INSTALL_BASE message on the third line above is what's
causing my issue. Looking at the makefiles, though, I can't see where
it's picking up either value from.
Can someone point me in the right direction to fix this?
Thanks,
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic
ually it's in the morning first thing that I need to
kick it to get it working).
Where's a good place to start trying to identify the issue?
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openw
On Mon, 21 May 2012 23:23:21 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Recompiling now and will follow-up and let the list know if that took
> care of it.
That did, once I remembered that since I enabled shadow passwords, I had
to actually reset the password. :)
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please k
unning the
diff script - something I need to remember to do when weirdness happens),
I saw that it was disabled. Recompiling now and will follow-up and let
the list know if that took care of it.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the li
wards.
opkg shows a number of luci-related updates available along the lines of:
luci - 0.9+svn8682-1 - trunk+svn8682-1
And if I upgrade to trunk+svn8682-1 (which I have to force because luci-
admin-full has some conflicting files), then I can login, but most of the
administration
y build system it shows versions
0.9.32-git and 0.9.33 right now.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:18:16 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2012-04-16 12:10 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:59:15 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>
>>> OpenWrt has been using uClibc 0.9.33 for a while now, whereas you seem
>>> to be using 0.9.
nd had forgotten about it.
Will reconfigure to use the updated uClibc and let it build with that.
Thanks again,
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openw
week or so. My build process is such that I
do a 'make distclean' before every compile, so it should be building
completely from scratch each time.
Is this a known issue?
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
he router
had no problems at all.
In the end, I ended up reverting to build 27572, which I knew worked
prior to the upgrade.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 22:56:59 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
> No change here with 28096 (svn info shows r28106 but the last changed
> rev is r28096).
>
> After a while, stations just can't reconnect and get an IP address,
> though the router is sending the address.
Reverted
ere with 28096 (svn info shows r28106 but the last changed rev
is r28096).
After a while, stations just can't reconnect and get an IP address,
though the router is sending the address.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on
or something similar to that - the
physical layer connects but the dhcpoffer is never accepted by the
device. Restarting the network on the router gave me a temporary fix.
I'll get this version (last change shows as 28096, same as yours)
installed and see if that helps.
Thanks!
Jim
-
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:55:38 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
> I updated to r28089 yesterday and have noticed a significant number of
> problems with wireless since then.
>
> The hardware is a D-Link DIR-825. I only use Radio0 for my wireless.
>
> Normally, I can stream video wi
couldn't even get an IP address.
When I started updating from SVN today, I noticed the first couple of
files changed since building yesterday seemed related to wireless, so I
thought I'd ask if anyone else is seeing similar issues.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on t
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 00:03:18 +0100, Manuel Munz wrote:
> On 06.03.2011 23:55, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> /usr/sbin/uhttpd: can't resolve symbol '__fpcmp_parts_f'
>
> There is already a ticket for that: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/8959
Awesome, thanks for the qu
sing something that's probably obvious - can someone point
me in the right direction?
Thanks,
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
take care of that for me?
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
ild_dir and that didn't help
either.
Thanks,
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
it, there's a recovery console that doesn't
require a serial connection or JTAG connector to use.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
x27;ve asked it not to - but
as an old coworker of mine was fond of saying, "if it's stupid but it
works, it ain't stupid." :-)
Thanks for the assist, much appreciated.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
t; successfully,
Thanks, I'll give that a try. It seems odd, though, that it's trying to
build cfdisk when I've told it not to - but I'm willing to give anything
a try to get past this. :-)
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:55:10 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Trying to compile r22936 here.
Still seeing this with r22987 - am I the only one seeing this issue?
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benef
DIR-825 target.
Thanks for any pointers.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
I can. If not, oh well, that'll
teach me not to make a backup first. ;-)
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.
a day and nothing in the logs
was making it clear to me why I was seeing a problem (indeed, the only
updates seemed to be for a different platform than what I build for).
Appreciate all the tips and everyone's help. I'm still fairly new to
building this code - but I also like testing b
the
>> discussion?
>
> Yes, it's confusing. Maybe it should be in a FAQ. Finding the root cause
> may be interesting, but I think that to most people here, the benefits
> don't outweight the cost of tracking down these "bugs".
Fair enough - that trick did work fo
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:37:13 +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote:
> Le lundi 26 juillet 2010 à 16:13 +0000, Jim Henderson a écrit :
>> I've tracked it down to build 22385 - 22384 (which has the last commit
>> at 22383) builds, 22385 doesn't for me.
>
> But you said earli
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:13:32 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
> I've tracked it down to build 22385 - 22384 (which has the last commit
> at 22383) builds, 22385 doesn't for me.
Really strange, I backed down to 22383 and now it won't build that one
either.
Jim
--
Jim Hend
ago,
> but learned to clean the offending package if I'm the only one seeing
> the problem.
I've tracked it down to build 22385 - 22384 (which has the last commit at
22383) builds, 22385 doesn't for me.
What process do you use to clean the offendi
down. :-)
I'll probably identify which is the last release to build tomorrow
morning, it looks like r22380 is going to be successful, so I'll jump
ahead to r22384 and try that next - that'll probably run while I'm
sleeping.
Jim
--
amp; make' of the entire trunk
I've noticed this in my testing - r22344 seems to build OK, r22348
doesn't. I'll see if I can narrow it down a bit more (I'm building
r22344 now).
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
_
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:18:53 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
> When trying to build from the latest sources, I get the following output
> (with V=99) on 'make world':
Seems to be working now.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so e
penwrt/feeds/
packages/net/miniupnpd'
make[2]: *** [package/feeds/packages/miniupnpd/install] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jhenderson/Downloads/openwrt'
make[1]: *** [/home/jhenderson/Downloads/openwrt/staging_dir/target-
mips_r2_uClibc-0.9.30.1/stamp/.package_install] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jhenderson/Downloads/openwrt'
make: *** [world] Error 2
--- snip ---
Building for an ar7xx (D-Link DIR-825).
Anyone else seeing this issue with different targets?
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
as soon as you select the "D-Link DIR-825 rev. B1" as the
> target profile the correct default settings for the kernel build would
> be selected automatically.
Perfect, thanks for both pieces of information. I'll try my new build
o
Hi,
I've just started using openwrt on a D-Link DIR-825 (as those who also
read the user list are probably already aware), and in trying to
troubleshoot a DLNA issue, I'd like to try the latest experimental
firmware pulled from the source repository.
In configuring the firmware image, I have b
41 matches
Mail list logo
