Hi,
Please add raw triggers to only the interfaces specified in the list.
Regards,
Amine.
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Conor O'Gorman wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20/05/16 14:43, Hans Dedecker wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Davi
Hi,
Please add raw triggers to only the interfaces specified in the list.
Regards,
Amine.
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> The busybox ntpd utility currently uses ntp servers specified in uci.
> This patch allows the ntpd utility to use NTP servers received via DHCP(v6)
>
Hi,
One feature that was requested is the ability to specify a list of
interfaces to get servers from.
You can save the list as an option to the config file and add a trigger to
only those interfaces.
Regards,
Amine.
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> The busybox ntpd utilit
Hi,
One feature that was requested is the ability to specify a list of
interfaces to get servers from.
You can save the list as an option to the config file and add a trigger to
only those interfaces.
Regards,
Amine.
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> > I wan
My bad, will send a new patch.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 8:21 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 20/04/2016 20:09, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > On 20 April 2016 at 16:48, amine.ahd wrote:
> >> Hostapd allows more than one RADIUS server to be added in case the main
> server goes down.
> >> This allows n
Can anyone confirm this issue so I could try and find a fix for it?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
So did the patch fix the problem and is it going to be added to the
official procd repo?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-01-28 15:39, Kenneth Johansson wrote:
> > when using rpcd and updating config files using the ubus interface there
> > is a memory leak in pr
cat /etc/banner:
Bleeding Edge, r48488
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Amine Aouled Hamed
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> When adding an interface trigger to sysntpd, the trigger won't work when
> another trigger is present(in this case a reload trigger for system).
> below is the servi
Hi,
When adding an interface trigger to sysntpd, the trigger won't work when
another trigger is present(in this case a reload trigger for system).
below is the service_triggers function I used for sysntpd:
service_triggers()
{
local script=$(readlink "$initscript")
local name=$(basename ${
Anyone tried both triggers at the same time and checked if it works
correctly?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Amine Aouled Hamed
wrote:
> this is the patch:
> ---
> package/utils/busybox/files/sysntpd | 8
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/pac
igger
+
procd_add_reload_trigger "system"
procd_add_validation validate_ntp_section
}
What I found is that commenting out the system reload trigger will make the
interface trigger work. Maybe a bug when adding multiple triggers?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Bastian Bitto
My bad, could this be deleted please? Thanks
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:03 PM, amine ahd wrote:
> ---
> package/utils/busybox/files/sysntpd | 8
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/package/utils/busybox/files/sysntpd
> b/package/utils/busybox/files/sysntpd
> index f73bb83
So using the latest procd version,
I added a simple logger message on top start_service() in sysntpd and added
the triggers in service_triggers and to test I just unplugged and
re-plugget my network cable and checked logread.
Nothing shows up.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Amine Aouled Hamed
Hi Felix,
Actually I made my tests on an old version of OpenWrt, maybe procd changed
since that version.
Will make another tests using the current version and let you know of the
results.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-01-22 14:12, Amine Aouled Hamed wr
Hi,
I tried this method the first time but it does nothing.
I just tried it again now and the same thing happens (added a log message
to logread in case it is restarted).
Thats why I went to the hotplug script, add to it the fact that we cant
choose specific interfaces to listen to using this metho
Ah sorry, I thought he meant the description of the patch.
Will change it now
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Bastian Bittorf
wrote:
> * amine ahd [20.01.2016 10:09]:
>
> thank you!
>
> > The current state of NTP is to load the list of NTP servers
> > from the static file /etc/config/system.
>
> please make var 'iface' local and while you are there, move
> all the 'local' declaration to the head of the function.
Wouldn't be better if the local vars inside of the if and for statements
stay inside?
I mean what is the point of declaring ifaces if I will be using all the
ifaces? in term o
Apologies, I was working with an old fork of Openwrt.
another version (hopefully the last) will be sent soon.
Regards,
Amine.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Bastian Bittorf
wrote:
> * amine ahd [12.01.2016 10:08]:
> > ---
> > package/utils/busybox/Makefile | 3 ++
> > package/
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Bastian Bittorf
wrote:
> when looking at the present code, it
> returns when the static list is empty.
>
> maybe it's a rare condition, but your code
> changes the behavior. for now ignore this
> and polish the rest, lets see what the others say.
>
> bye, bastian
>
Happy new year!
Thanks for the explanation, I will be sending a new patch today.
Regards,
Amine.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30 December 2015 at 20:12, Amine Aouled Hamed
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > Can you elaborate more on
Hi,
Can you elaborate more on why you prefer uci state? I am just starting with
OpenWRT and the first thing I found was procd.
Regards,
Amine.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> Hi, amine
>
> On 23 December 2015 at 00:00, amine ahd wrote:
> > The current state of NTP is to
21 matches
Mail list logo
