Re: ULA prefix lifetime

2024-11-20 Thread Christoph Hartmann
It is what it is sadly there is no use in complaining - I think we all can imagine our perfect provider ... //chriss On 11/21/24 07:54, Götz Görisch wrote: Michael, :-( {Your ISP should avoid that kind of thing; IPv6 being plentiful there is no reason not to just statically allocate them

Re: ULA prefix lifetime

2024-11-20 Thread Michael Richardson
chriss wrote: > I happens that I have to reconnect my VDSL (update of router, tripped over > cable, whatever) - with that I get a new IPv6 prefix delegated. Now my > clients have 2 prefixes/addresses. The old one (before the router :-( {Your ISP should avoid that kind of thing; IPv6

Re: ULA prefix lifetime

2024-11-20 Thread Paul D
I proposed a 'fix' or, at least, a new feature to specify prefix lifetimes about a half-year ago which @Ansuel just reviewed a few days ago. See [RFC PATCH 08/14] router: clamp prefix valid_lt to interface valid_lifetime which... ideally should go in a separate patch (but this version depended

ULA prefix lifetime

2024-11-20 Thread chriss
Hi I have the following scenario: - a router with openwrt - a (german) VDSL connection with IPv4 and IPv6 - a delegated IPv6 prefix (/56) that I use in my internal LAN segments My problem: I happens that I have to reconnect my VDSL (update of router, tripped over cable, whatever) - with tha