On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Michael Richardson wrote:
{sorry for the long delay, been unwell}
Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Maybe it is possible to deploy the system with secure boot and a
> protected IDevId key by default, but allowing the user/owner to erase
> the key and disable secure boot? This
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 03:04:37PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> {sorry for the long delay, been unwell}
>
> Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > Maybe it is possible to deploy the system with secure boot and a
> > protected IDevId key by default, but allowing the user/owner to eras
{sorry for the long delay, been unwell}
Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Maybe it is possible to deploy the system with secure boot and a
> protected IDevId key by default, but allowing the user/owner to erase
> the key and disable secure boot? This way all use cases could be
> supported, in
From: Rafał Miłecki
I'd like to slightly update mt76 for 23.05.
This update:
1. Is important for MT7996 (important features including WED support)
2. Includes minor fixes for mt7915 & mt7921
Felix Fietkau (2):
mt76: update to the latest version
mt76: update to Git HEAD (2023-12-08)
packag
From: Felix Fietkau
b5d13611d35e mt76: mt7915: fix monitor mode issues
bbbac7deee3d wifi: mt76: rename mt76_packet_id_init/flush to
mt76_wcid_init/cleanup
f1e1e67d97d1 wifi: mt76: fix race condition related to checking tx queue fill
status
b3f739a64e6b wifi: mt76: mt7996: add eht rx rate suppor
From: Felix Fietkau
890ae4d717f1 wifi: mt76: mt76x02: fix MT76x0 external LNA gain handling
fcc2f3d82bc9 wifi: mt76: fix lock dependency problem for wed_lock
77cc14596202 wifi: mt76: mt792x: move mt7921_skb_add_usb_sdio_hdr in mt792x
module
bc85355885d1 wifi: mt76: mt792x: move some common usb c
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>
> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
> > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my
> > understanding that there should be updates for the newer 2.7.0.1 branch
> > as well (2.7.0.1 branch is also in l
On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
> It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my
> understanding that there should be updates for the newer 2.7.0.1 branch
> as well (2.7.0.1 branch is also in linux-firmware).
Yes, I also told them in the support ticket th
Kalle Valo writes:
> + ath11k, jeff
>
> Sven Eckelmann writes:
>
>> On Monday, 26 February 2024 15:50:44 CET Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> [...]
The Qualcomm bulletin[1] says "Patches are being actively
>>> > shared with OEMs".
>>> >
>>> > Were these bugfixes made available for OpenWRT? Is there
